Showing posts with label tobin. Show all posts
Showing posts with label tobin. Show all posts
Friday, November 22, 2013
Meanwhile, in Las Vegas...
It's mostly the color scheme and the dress-over-tights look, but the first scene of Paul Tobin and Colleen Coover's Bandette really reminded me of another caped and masked young person, here drawn by Damion Scott, I believe.
At any rate, I have a brief review of Bandette Vol. 1: Presto! in this week's issue of Las Vegas Weekly. It's a really great comic book, and I had a blast reading.
I was particularly impressed with the way Coover's art looked like something from a classic European comic album, rather than the work of the Colleen Coover I've most recently seen in American comics. It wasn't so great or so fun that it made me want to start following it online or anything—I'm probably always gonna prefer paper to the screen of my laptop—but thanks to Dark Horse's collection, the curious need no longer choose between reading it online or not reading it at all.
I can't wait for the next one.
Thursday, January 14, 2010
Speaking of Marvel...
—This is kind of lame of Marvel. Yesterday Johanna Draper Carlson drew attention to another of the publisher's less-than-noble marketing efforts, pointing out that Marvel was claiming that they wouldn't be publishing a second printing of Siege #1, when they have a Siege #1: Director's Cut scheduled for release in March. The "director's cut" adds eight-pages of content described as "choice extras," for an extra $1. So they are having a second printing of the comic, they're just adding a subtitle and some extra material and calling it something different, so it just depends on how technical you want to be about what constitutes a second printing, I guess.
—This is very cool of Marvel. Yesterday retailer, critic and pundit Brian Hibbs complained publicly about a problem at his store, in which a plumbing problem above his shop lead to a swathe of his Marvel comics being ruined. David Gabriel, one of the folks in Marvel marketing, offered to replace Hibbs' stock. I just thought I'd list that here given all the invective I poured their way yesterday. As perplexing and damaging to the medium/industry as some of their moves are, it's not like they're a bunch of devils actively seeking new and creative ways to work evil in the world all day. (Well, there are probably some devils on staff doing that...Mephisto, for instance, whom I believe is a VP in the company).
—This is very weird of Marvel. I had expressed curiosity and concern over the apparent end of their Marvel Adventures line in the past, most recently when talking about the latest collection of Marvel Adventures Spider-Man, which I really enjoyed, in large part because of how writer Paul Tobin managed to make a new Spidey story that was at once classic and unique.
Well, Marvel is relaunching their MA books with two titles, Spider-Man and Super Heroes. The former will have the exact same creative team as before, which means the relaunch must be direction-oriented (the cover does have a redheaded classmate looking out the window at Spidey, and Mary Jane wasn't in any of the MA Spider-Man comics I had read).
The latter is still being written by Paul Tobin, but it's apparently going back to its rotating star format, which it had just been shifted away from to become a new all-ages Avengers series.
So new #1, but same writer (and, in one case, same artist). I guess I'll have to wait for the comic to see if something about the contents necessitated the re-boot, or if Marvel just decided to spruce up the line with new #1's a few months after giving the books new directions.
At any rate, as a reader, I'm glad to hear that Spidey team is going to be staying on Spidey, and I'll be looking forward to future collections of it.
—This is very cool of Marvel. Yesterday retailer, critic and pundit Brian Hibbs complained publicly about a problem at his store, in which a plumbing problem above his shop lead to a swathe of his Marvel comics being ruined. David Gabriel, one of the folks in Marvel marketing, offered to replace Hibbs' stock. I just thought I'd list that here given all the invective I poured their way yesterday. As perplexing and damaging to the medium/industry as some of their moves are, it's not like they're a bunch of devils actively seeking new and creative ways to work evil in the world all day. (Well, there are probably some devils on staff doing that...Mephisto, for instance, whom I believe is a VP in the company).
—This is very weird of Marvel. I had expressed curiosity and concern over the apparent end of their Marvel Adventures line in the past, most recently when talking about the latest collection of Marvel Adventures Spider-Man, which I really enjoyed, in large part because of how writer Paul Tobin managed to make a new Spidey story that was at once classic and unique.
Well, Marvel is relaunching their MA books with two titles, Spider-Man and Super Heroes. The former will have the exact same creative team as before, which means the relaunch must be direction-oriented (the cover does have a redheaded classmate looking out the window at Spidey, and Mary Jane wasn't in any of the MA Spider-Man comics I had read).
The latter is still being written by Paul Tobin, but it's apparently going back to its rotating star format, which it had just been shifted away from to become a new all-ages Avengers series.
So new #1, but same writer (and, in one case, same artist). I guess I'll have to wait for the comic to see if something about the contents necessitated the re-boot, or if Marvel just decided to spruce up the line with new #1's a few months after giving the books new directions.
At any rate, as a reader, I'm glad to hear that Spidey team is going to be staying on Spidey, and I'll be looking forward to future collections of it.
Wednesday, June 24, 2009
Assuming Spider-Man is referring to the proportional strength of a spider.
As Tom Spurgeon points out in the link to last night's post ("Spider-Man is correct") he put in the "Quick Hits and Craft" section of his June 24 post, "Spider-Man Is Not Correct." And Tom is correct regarding whether or not Spider-Man's statement is correct. Most, if not all, bald guys are stronger than most, if not all, spiders. I'm pretty sure even the weakest bald guy in the world (Mr. Burns from The Simpsons holds that title, I think) could bench press more weight than the strongest spider in the world. A man with the proportional strength of a spider, like Spider-Man, is stronger than most bald guys, however. Certainly stronger than The Puppet Master, whose dolls he's depicted taking away above.
Spider-Man should really speak more clearly. And I should have thought of Tom's joke, which was funnier than mine.
Tuesday, June 23, 2009
Spider-Man is correct.
There are quite a few mad scientists in my men's social club, and a few of them actually proved spider strength's superiority to bald guy's strength scientifically. They irradiated me and then had me bite a puny high school nerd. Did the kid gain the proportional strength of a bald guy? The results were inconclusive, as my strength is pretty much the equivalent of your average puny high school nerd. But the test subject's hair did get a bit thinner within the week, and I had to have some skin abnormalities removed a few months later.
(Panel scanned from Marvel Adventures Avengers #37, written by Paul Tobin and illustrated by Dario Brizuela and Leandro Corral)
Labels:
marvel adventures avengers,
phoning it in,
spider-man,
tobin
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


