Thursday, November 21, 2013

Comic shop comics: November 13-20

Afterlife With Archie #2 (Archie Comics) Here are a few phrases I never expected to read in an Archie comic:

"...Jughead Jones ate Ethel Muggs right in front of us, and no one did anything but stare..."

"I'm done playing 'Brokeback Riverdale' with you."

"...the thing that was once jughead Jones..."

Of course, that is a large part of what makes this unlikely series, a zombie horror movie story featuring the cast from Archie Comics, such a kick. Well, that and the fact that Roberto Aguirre-Sacasa writes a perfectly solid zombie story so well, using the pre-established characters to great effect without descending into parody at any point, and that Francesco Francavilla straight-up draws the hell out of the book (And his moody, Halloween coloring is great).

Zombie cannibal aspects aside, I was a little surprised at how adult the book was, including Cheryl Blossom referencing alcohol, a panel suggesting sexual jealousy toward Archie coming from her brother and a rather frank discussion in a diner between two lesbian character (I'm not sure familiar enough with the citizens of Riverdale to know if they are new characters or if they previously existed).

And if you're curious as to what Francavilla's art might look like were drawing the cast in the more traditional Archie house style rather than the realistic versions he's using here, there's an awfully nice next issue panel:
Finally, this issue also includes a reprint of an old 1970s horror comic from the pages of old Archie horror anthology Chilling Adventures in Sorcery, a six-page, black and white story called "...Cat" written and drawn by the great Gray Morrow. It's extremely wordy and a somewhat typical supernatural twist story, but good God almighty is Morrow's art gorgeous. I guess the plan is for future issues of the series to include reprints of such stories. Great value for a $2.99 comic, really.


Batman '66 #5 (DC Comics) Two things about the cover, which is once again drawn by the great Mike Allred and colored by the also great Laura Allred. First, the credits cite a "Jarrell" as one of the artists, but the story not drawn by Coover is actually drawn by Rubin Procopio; what's up, cover credits? And second, wow does Mike Allred draw a sexy Batgirl! His It Girl covers long ago convinced me how good he is at drawing the female form, but I guess it's been a long time since I've seen him apply his thick, curving linework to a famous superheroine like that. I've long hoped Allred would do some interior work on this series; now I kinda hope it's a Batgirl story.

The artist they get to draw the Batgirl story is no slouch either, though. That would be Colleen Coover (Her Bandette, written by Paul Tobin, is available as a graphic novel from Dark Horse is in stores this week; you should really check it out if you're not already reading the strip online).  It's the first appearance of Batgirl in this particular series, and I had forgotten how much I liked the librarian-by-day, superhero-by-night version of the character. I had also forgotten that this Barbara Gordon didn't have red hair, but a short black bob, and she put on a wig to become Batgirl (In my defense, I haven't watched this show since grade-school). While Batman and Robin "are in Japan, "helping their police hunt down the elusive Lord Death Man" (!!!) it's up to Batgirl to stop Catwoman, who in this episode story is now played by Eartha Kitt.

The lead story features Batman and Robin battling The Sandman, a villain from the show I have no memory of. This is the one drawn by Procopio, whose style is a lot more consciously funny-looking than that of most of the artists involved in the series so far (His Bruce Wayne also looks extremely Adam West-ern).


Daredevil #33 (Marvel Entertainment) I'm guessing Chris Samnee at least did the breakdowns for this issue, as he again shares a "storytellers" credit with Mark Waid, while a Jason Copland is credited as the "Art" (Interestingly, most of the folks involved are assigned a noun describing what they do, like Colorist, Letterer, Assistant Editor, etc, but the artist and cover artists are just assigned "Art" and "Cover." Well, it's interesting to me, anyway; I also lay awake at night trying to figure out why DC and Marvel spell "penciller" with different numbers of L's).

To everyone's credit, this is another issue that Samnee did not draw that it took me a while to notice that he didn't draw it (page eight, I think it was); that's another reason I suspect he might have done breakdowns, but, either way, it's to Copland's credit that the look and feel of the book remains so consistent even when Samnee's not putting the all the lines down on the page.

This is the conclusion to the two-part arc in which Daredevil teams-up with the Legion of Monsters, part of a larger arc in which our hero seeks to combat the Sons of the Serpents' infiltration of the New York judicial system. Given the scope of the conflict, and the ongoing subplot involving Foggy Nelson's cancer, I'm really surprised to learn that the book is ending in just three more issues. I understand Waid and a new artist will take the character into online only (?) comics, but I won't read those until they see print (if they ever do; I'm hoping their digital first, like a bunch of the DC comics I read now, rather than digital period).


Forever Evil: Arkham War #2 (DC) In this issue, nothing anything at all like what's on the cover happens!

What does happen? Well, if you read the first issue, you'll remember that the various Batman villains carved up Gotham City into their own little themed fiefdoms (sorta like what happened in No Man's Land), with The Scarecrow acting as the villains' leader and The Penguin acting as the city's de facto mayor. Meanwhile, Bane has invaded the city with an army of soldiers hopped up on Venom and made landfall at Blackgate Prison, where he plans to free and arm the sane criminals there to add to his forces and take over Gotham (also, I guess all the leftover owls from the first year of Scott Snyder and Greg Capullo's Batman are cryogenically stored under there?).

So Bane's forces invade Man-Bat's block, where Man-Bat has turned a bunch of guys into Men-Bats, and Bane himself takes a meeting with Mayor Penguin. The Bat-villain army preemptively attacks Blackgate and try to steal the frozen owls before Bane can wake 'em up and use them. Also, Commissioner Gordon tries to rescue Blackgate's warden, because that gives writer Peter Tomasi an excuse to put Gordon in the story.

I can't say the story makes a whole lot of sense, in large part because I don't really know many of the players very well anymore in the wake of the new 52 reboot and others I've never even heard of before (Brute...?), and in small part because bits of penciller Scot Eaton and Jaime Mendoza's art don't read very clearly, particularly at the climax (Did Bane rip off one of Man-Bat's wings? Did he capture The Scarecrow? Did the Scarecrow inject him with toxin? If not, why not? Did those two get away? The scene just...changes, leaving what should be a big part of the conflict unresolved).
So what's up with that lady in the background's right arm, exactly? Venom is, as they say, a hell of a drug.
It's interesting to see the ways in which Eaton and company try to make the comic book Bane more closely resemble the movie Bane. They still draw him like the Hulk, with fists as big as his head, but they have him holding his vests or suspender like Tom Hardy does in the movie. Eaton also draws Bane with his eyes visible through the holes in his mask, akin to movie Bane, rather than with red lenses in his mask, ala comic book Bane, but colorist Andrew Dalhouse gives Bane glowing red eyeballs (?).
The best part of the issue, though, is the next issue box, which reads "Next: Das Bat!"

Did no one ever make a Batman/Das Boot joke before? It really seems like the sort of joke someone should have made by this point.


Harley Quinn #0 (DC) So this is maybe the most exciting comic book DC has published in...I don't know, when was Wednesday Comics? (Well, the new volume of Batman: Black and White was pretty exciting too, but that story where Dan DiDio had Batman stuttering about not fighting kiddie porn while he has Man-Bat eat the guy who was making porn films with Man-Bat's kids kinda made me want to forget that project exists.)

So, here's the pitch for this: It's a 20-page comic book in which Harley Quinn writers Amanda Conner and Jimmy Palmiotti appear as voices in Harley's head and discuss potential artists for her upcoming series with her, with nearly every page featuring her in some form of bizarre situation or another, drawn by a different artist. These artists are among the most talented and noteworthy stylists who don't seem to mind working for DC at all, having done work for them in the recent past. So we see work from Becky Cloonan, Darwyn Cooke, Sam Kieth, Bruce Timm, Adam Hughes, Walter Simonson and Art Baltazar (who draws a Harley invading the Tiny Titans treehouse). Conner draws a bit, as does Chad Hardin, who will be drawing the series when it officially launches with a #1, and then there's Jeremy Roberts, a newcomer who won whatever goofy contest there was associated with the book (For what its worth, his art is nice, but seems to be exactly the wrong tone for the page of script he gets; his style is very straight, very representational, and a lot like everything else DC publishes, meaning the Duck Amuck aspect is lost; also that last panel doesn't really work...if you're going to visually quote a famous movie image, you should probably put some effort into actually resembling it).

Tony S. Daniel, whose New 52 work included the first arcs of the rebooted Detective Comics, a Justice League arc and who is now drawing Superman/Wonder Woman, contributes a page, although he draws Harley as a giant, building-eating robot. Jim Lee's contribution is actually just a page from his short  Batman run, with Harley's costume "digitally tweaked" (i.e. changed form her original duds to her new New 52 costume, as seen on the cover). Palmiotti's voice points out that Lee's three-panel contribution isn't exactly a new drawing and, in fact, he and Conner tend to discuss the work of the artists involved on almost every page, often making fun of them in one way or another (In some cases, they or Harley mention that as good as the artists are, they just can't keep a monthly schedule and thus can't draw the ongoing; I found that particularly amusing, given than Conner and Palmiotti are themselves artists, and neither of them are going to be drawing the book, just writing it).

The best part may be Cooke's contribution, in which Harley teams up with Catwoman to rob Palmiotti and Conner's wedding, as it sees Cooke drawing in a highly-exaggerated cartoon style that doesn't look like what one might expect from the artist.

I was rather curious about the book's construction, as in some cases it seems like Harley and the writers are commenting on the art as if they were seeing it for the first time, so I imagine the artists had a great deal of latitude, and jokes or references were filled in after it came back.
For example, check out the Simonson panel, where she mentions "some robot guy," presumably just because Simonson drew a robotic hand at the bottom of the page.

And the worst part? That would probably be the last panel tag reading, "Continued in Harley Quinn #1, where we swear we sill stop breaking the Fourth Wall!" Other than some of the great art on display  (I'll take some more Tradd Moore in the future, please), that's probably the best part of the comic.

That last page does seem to tease the premise a bit, as Harley is willed some Coney Island real estate. I'm not sure how the book will go once the creators stop making fun comics and have to get serious—and it's not like there's a great variety of tone in the New 52, so I don't have high hopes that they will be allowed to be very funny moving forward—but this here is a pretty damn fun comic book, and well worth your $3 for the tour of artists alone.

Classic Popeye #16 (IDW) This may have started becoming evident in previous issues, but this is the one that it really struck me. Bud Sagendorf's comic book Popeye has at this point begun to more closely resemble the cartoon Popeye more so than the original comic strip version. For example, now he's only bullet-proof and super-strong after swallowing a can of spinach, rather than being inherently invincible.

I like the other way better.

Ah well. This is still the one of the best values in serial comics, in terms of dollars-to-good comics, and remains one of my favorite reads each month (Given that these are reprints from comics made before my dad was born, I think that might say something less than flattering about the current state of comic books. Or maybe it just says something about how awesome a cartoonist Sagendorf is, and how compelling E.C. Segar's creations are).

In this issue, Popeye and Olive visit African in order to try and convince some animals to come back home with them to live in a zoo (Is that how zoos get their animals...?), then they protect a gold shipment from bad guys in a story that ends with Popeye doing some real horror movie shit in the last panel, then Wimpy tries to score five free hamburgers by wearing various disguises, one of which involves what has to be one of the worst ways to make a false beard (see above) and then there's a prose story I didn't read and a Ham Gravy solo story in which a Native American stereotype gets the better of Olive's old cowboy sweetheart.


Scooby-Doo Team-Up #1 (DC) I had pretty high hopes for this comic, which re-teamed Scooby and the gang with Batman and Robin, and am happy to report that my expectations weren't only met, but exceeded.

Writer Sholly Fisch's "Man Bat and Robbin'" finds the Mystery Inc team investigating reports of a giant bat creature and, in the parking lot near a mall, they encounter one such bat creature: Their old pal Batman, and his partner Robin ("Long time, no see, Batman-- Ever since our run-in with The Joker and The Penguin!" Daphne says, referring to the 1972 "The Caped Crusader Caper" from The New Scooby-Doo Movies).  When a panic erupts inside the mall, they find not one but three Man-Bats engaged in petty robbery (or are they really Man-Bats, and not, say, run-of-the-mill thieves in rubber masks seeking to take advantage of the panic caused by the real Man-Bat?), in addition to the genuine article.

Fisch pulls off a heck of a balancing act in the script, leaning quite close to the tone of the current Scooby-Doo: Mystery Incorporated series' sense of humor, which often makes jokes at the expense of the franchise, but never going too far in that particular direction.  His Batman and Robin aren't the same Batman and Robin that appeared in those old Scooby-Doo episodes, either; those were basically animated versions of the Adam West and Burt Ward Batman and Robin (in better costumes), whereas as these seem like more straightforward, less silly versions; these are the classic comic book Batman and Robin.
While making with some good gags—I don't think I laughed out loud at any point, but I did think "heh" a good half-dozen times while reading—Fisch also hits the requisite beats of a Scooby-Doo adventure, from the un-masking scene to Scooby and Shaggy accidentally playing a pivotal role in the climactic capture, to Scooby repurposing a mask for a post-climax, pre-credits scaring of Shaggy.

The artwork, by Dario Brizuela, is pretty incredible. His Scooby and the gang look like they were taken directly form the old cartoons, right down to every character's every pose and expression, only here they are better "animated," the integrity of their designs staying more consistent than they often did during the old cartoons.

Robin and Batman are wearing their original costumes (Well, it's technically "New Look" Batman, with the yellow oval, but you know what I meant, right?), and look like compromises between how they appeared in the old Scooby-Doo cartoons and more modern, comic book-y versions of themselves. Batman in particular wears colors that are more black than blue (like Superman's hair used to look, his costume is perhaps so black its blue, or else its blue but Batman is so dark he just sorta emanates his own moody lighting), and the first panel he appears in looks like it could have come straight out of the DCU line.

As for Man-Bat, he looks like the version from Batman: The Animated Series.

It's a lot of juggling of styles, but Brizuela blends it all smoothly. I got a lot of good comics during this latest trip to the comics shop, but this may just be the very best of them.


SpongeBob Comics #26 (United Plankton Pictures)  Joey Weiser, Vanessa Williams, James Kochalka and Maris Wicks are among the creators offering up short SpongeBob gag comics this issue. The one I admire most (aside from the first of Kochaka's three strips, which actually made me laugh out loud) is Robert Leighton and Gregg Schigiel's "Sundae Stroll," in which the artist draws a series of five consecutive two-page splashes, with little, repeated images of Gary, SpongeBob and Patrick walking across them, their actions playing out on several different crisscrossing tiers. It's hard to explain, and I'm doing a bad job of it, but it's really quite inventive and I'm pretty astounded by how well executed it is.


Superior Foes of Spider-Man #5 (Marvel) The only thing that surprised me more than the fourth-to-last page was the second-to-last page. And that last page was pretty surprising too, come to think of it. I love this book.

Young Avengers #12 (Marvel) Oh superhero comics, you're just incorrigible. I like how this book has the words "Young Avengers Part One" on the cover, a few millimeters way from the number "012." I guess this is a story arc called "Young Avengers" in a book called Young Avengers, and someone thought that needed to go on the cover, which already says Young Avengers in a rather large font-size across the top of the book...?

The art, by  penciler (one L!) Jamie McKelvie and inkers Mike Norton, Stephen Thompson and McKelvie himself, is as excellent as always. As for the story, now that I know the title is ending and writer Kieron Gillen is leaving the book, the whole thing seems a lot worse in retrospect, as this seems to be nearing the conclusion of the book's very first story arc, telling the origin of this incarnation of a superhero team. But it's actually ending now? Seems a bit like watching a TV series where the pilot episode was somehow stretched out to 13 hour-long episodes, or a movie that is all first act. On the plus side, I guess Gillen may end up beating Brad Meltzer's Justice League of America run as the longest one story arc run on a Bit Two superhero comic book in the 21st century. That's...something.

I'm actually kind of annoyed that I've read 12 issues of this series, almost the entirety of this creative team's work on the book, and I have no idea who Miss America is, or anything about her, other than the fact that she calls Loki "Chico" for some reason.

Oh, and hey, how weird is it to see Marvel comic book characters talking about Scott Pilgrim?
Weirder still that Scott Pilgrim creator Bryan Lee O'Malley drew a variant cover for the first issue of this series.

I hope when Marvel re-relaunches this series as part of their All-New Marvel NOW! promotion, O'Malley is the new one-man creative team, and that the Earth-616 version of Kim Pine and Wallace Wells are in the new line-up.

Monday, November 18, 2013

Even in the far-flung future, when he's a grizzled, one-eyed old man...


...Dick Grayson will still have a great butt.

(Panels from Batman Beyond: 10,000 Clowns, drawn by Norm Breyfogle, colored by Andrew Elder and written by Adam Beechen)

Sunday, November 17, 2013

I've recently noticed a problem with DC's trade collections I didn't realize existed.

A couple months back, after belatedly reading Batman Vol. 1: The Court of Owls, one of those trades I decided to wait for and actually got around to actually purchasing and reading, I was eager enough to find out what happened next that I wanted to read the next volume immediately, which mean finding it at a library (at that point, no trade was yet available, just a hardcover). I was a little surprised to find two different titles that looked like they might be the next volume, Batman: Night of Owls and Batman: City of Owls. I requested the former before realizing the difference: Night was a big, fat collection containing all of the "Night of the Owls" tie-in stories from across the Batman line of comics, while City was actually the next volume of Scott Snyder and Greg Capullo's Batman comic (the latter officially has a "Vol. 2" in the title, although that was missing from several of the library catalogs I searched).

So Night contains all the issues of Batman and Robin, Nightwing, Batgirl, Batwing and so on that had their own brief stories—generally just an issue, maybe two—that tied-in to the "Night" story arc. I was pretty surprised to find it contained four issues of the Snyder/Capullo Batman title, and the first New 52  Batman Annual (co-written by Snyder), as those seem like they would be issues that should be collected in the second volume of Batman, not in this huge, companion/check-list collection.

I remember thinking that was pretty weird at the time, but ultimately just assuming DC must have chosen to collect those there because they thought the book wouldn't make sense otherwise without them (Similarly, DC has just released Batman Vol. 3: Death of the Family and Joker: Death of the Family and are starting to release all of the Batman books that had "Death of" tie-ins, most of which take "Death of the Family" as their sub-titles; all of them that I've seen so far include Batman #17, the final chapter of the story, because that provides the conclusion to the cliffhanger ending of many of the tie-ins.)

So whatever.

But then in September, I read Animal Man Vol. 3: Rotworld: The Red Kingdom, a trade paperback collecting what, at the time, sure seemed to be most of the Animal Man/Swamp Thing crossover story "Rotworld," which contained eight issues of Animal Man and two issues of Swamp Thing (Pretty much a complete story, save with a rather important-seeming section in which Swamp Thing acquires a weapon that will save the day and, therefore, reads like a pure example of deus ex machina).

This month DC released Swamp Thing Vol. 3: Rotworld: The Green Kingdom (not sure why there was such a delay between the two, as they occur simultaneously, and tell the same story from different points of view). That contained seven issues of Swamp Thing and two issues of Animal Man. The way the story is structured, the two characters meet at the beginning, journey to Rotworld together, are separated from one another for a stretch of time, and then reunite at the climax. And, while I didn't count pages, a lot of material appears in both collections, because it is necessary to the story, although neither story is actually a complete one (remember what I said about Animal Man Vol. 3), without the missing parts.

It's a very strange way to collect these comics which, when they were originally published serially as comic books, they crossed-over with one another in a Superman triangle sort of way—you would read an issue of Animal Man, then one of Swamp Thing, then one of Animal Man, and so on. The entire point of such a publishing strategy, when it comes to the serial comics, is that it encourages readers of Animal Man to also pick up Swamp Thing, and vice versa (and, hopefully, readers of one will like the other enough to keep reading it when the crossover ends).

But the way the trades are published, they seem to be collected under the understanding that those who read Animal Man in trade probably won't also read Swamp Thing in trade, and vice versa (Which likely isn't true; aside from this storyline, the books share a lot of common ground, including starring characters who went from quirky DC superheroes to dark, mature horror titles under the Vertigo imprint, to recent New 52/DCU emigres; both are also written by Vertigo writers-turned-New 52 breakout stars).

So, if you are reading both titles in trade, and certainly that's what DC would want you to do, if you're not reading them both in serial, comic book form, then you're getting a significant overlap of material in the two trades, which has to be frustrating giving the cost of a graphic novel these days (These are $17 a pop).

Here's another, final example. When DC first announced the "Throne of Atlantis" storyline, a crossover between the Geoff Johns-written Aquaman comic and the Geoff Johns-written Justice League comic (in which Aquaman prominently appears), I had two thoughts. First, that ought to really pump up sales for Aquaman, as Justice League was then still the best-selling DC comic (It's since been eclipsed by Batman).  And, second, how will they collect it, as a volume of Justice League, as a volume of Aquaman, as Aquaman/Justice League: Throne of Atlantis, or simply as Throne of Atlantis...?

What they ultimately decided on was collecting it as Justice League Vol. 3: Throne of Atlantis (collecting Justice League #13-17 and Aquaman #15-16) and as Aquaman Vol 3: Throne of Atlantis (collecting Justice League #15-17 and Aquaman #0 and #14-#16). The "Throne" storyline thus appears in both books, the colletctions having about 100 pages of identical material in them. Given that they are about 140-pages of story content apiece, that's a pretty significant story overlap, and given the price of these hardcover editions $24.99, that's gotta be maddening if you read both books in trade (And, again, these are both by Geoff Johns and both feature Aquaman; chances are, a lot of folks who read one in trade also read the other in trade).

So say you do buy and read both of these series in trade and you learn that these two volumes will mostly feature material in both, what do you do? Well, you could obviously just buy one, but there's still a problem, as their contents are mostly identical, but not completely so.

If you skip the Justice League trade, you'll miss two issues of Justice League (a Tony Daniel-drawn two-parter in which the League fights The Cheetah and Wonder Woman and Superman deal with their emerging relationship); if you skip the Aquaman trade, then you'll miss two issues of Aquaman (the #0 origin issue and a prologue to "Throne" involving a long conversation between the title character and his half-brother Orm, the crossover's primary antagonist).

Now, if you were reading both books as they were serially published, none of this matters. But if you were trade-waiting both of them it sure does.

I'm not sure why DC does this (I suspect this is also what happens with some of the Green Lantern books and will happen once the three-book Justice Leagues crossover "Trinity War" starts showing up in collections). It may be to encourage purchase of the monthlies in the future, by punishing trade-waiters, but that seems rather unlikely. It may simply be that the folks in charge of the comics and the crossovers don't really worry about how they're collecting, and then a different set of folks has to try and make sense of some way to collect them while still having generally complete-ish stories in each collection.

I think a better way to do it would be to excuse crossovers from the volume numbering, and run them under the title of the storyline or the characters involved. In the case of "Rotworld" then, it would have probably made more sense to publish a book collecting all of the relevant issues of both books and called it Animal Man/Swamp Thing: Rotworld, or simply Rotworld. In the case of "Throne," a Throne of Atlantis collection might have made the most sense, or perhaps a Justice League: Throne of Altantis, with no volume number attached.

I don't know, though. It's a pretty weird problem and one I can imagine being extremely frustrating for trade-waiters, and one that doesn't seem to have a completely perfect solution.

Saturday, November 16, 2013

Marvel's February previews reviewed

Marvel's solicitations for February of next year look a little more impenetrable than usual, with issue numbers ending with ".NOW" and comic books that were just rebooted being re-rebooted (The first collection of the new Wolverine was just released in September, and they're relaunching it, but doing so with the very same creative team working in the same direction, and even picking up on what happened in the previous story arcs?  How hard is that series going to be to follow in trade, as if making sense of the byzantine Wolverine library weren't hard enough already?).

They also make me a little more sad than usual, as I don't see a new issue of Young Avengers being solicited (and with good reason, I guess), nor a new issue of the all-Allred FF, which will also have wrapped up by February. That's two of the five monthlies from Marvel I'm currently buying/reading serially as they're published, and a third of those five is apparently shipping its last issue this month. There are two new series I'll probably try out, but both seem like they might as well be stamped "Cancelled On Arrival," so I don't expect either to last that long and thus to fill the suddenly opening up space on my pull list. 

I see a lot of mention of "Animal Variants by Katie Cook," which is only exciting in that it includes the words "Katie Cook." Should be interesting to see what those look like, exactly. "Design variants" is a phrase that appears in a lot of the solicits too, but there's no name attached, so I can't even begin to guess what those might look like.

Anyway, to read the full solicitations,  you can do so here. Otherwise, here's what jumped out at me this time around, for good or ill...

(Oh, and yeah, I noticed that the fonts are screwed up on a couple of the solicits near the end. I did something wrong while cutting-and-pasting them, and I can't fix the HTML at this point because I am dumb, and devoting still more time to this blog post doesn't seem worth it, as this whole post will soon be forgotten anyway. So, um, sorry the post doesn't look as good as it should, I guess...?)


ALL-NEW X-FACTOR #3

PETER DAVID (W) • CARMINE DI GIANDOMENICO (A)

Cover by KRIS ANKA & JARED FLETCHER
V

"Not Brand X"

• The All-New X-Factor is meant to help people..
.
• But one of their own has a secret.

• Hint: It's Gambit.

32 PGS./Rated T+ ...$3.99
Wait, is that supposed to be Gambit on the cover of All-New X-Force? That's not Gambit, is it? Because they had his costume and look kind of under control during his own series. This looks like quite a jump backwards. Is that costume to punish him for failing to keep his own monthly series going...? 

DAREDEVIL #36
MARK WAID (W) • CHRIS SAMNEE (A/C)
The Astounding Final Issue!
32 PGS./Rated T+ ...$2.99

The astounding what now? I...think I might have missed an extremely important announcement. 

FANTASTIC FOUR #1
JAMES ROBINSON (W) • LEONARD KIRK (A/C)

...
"THE FALL OF THE FANTASTIC FOUR" PART 1 
The world's greatest comics magazine begins anew with Marvel's First Family, the Fantastic Four! But as the brilliant MR. FANTASTIC, the compassionate INVISIBLE WOMAN, the ever lovin' THING & the hot-headed HUMAN TORCH embark on a strange mission, they aren't met with new beginnings, but an untimely end! As the family of cosmic explorers head towards their darkest hour, who could possibly be behind their downfall? And how is one of their oldest enemies, the sadistic dragon known as Fing-Fang-Foom involved? Prepare for the fantastic!

32 PGS./Rated T ...$3.99

This poor book seems a little over-rebooted—seems like I've tried out at least four drastic changes in direction and creative team since Civil War—and like the Cornel-written Wolverine, this book was just relaunched at the start of Marvel Now. I guess it's new #1 can at least be justified by the new creative team though, whereas Wolverine's reboot just seems arbitrary and weird (UPDATE: Carla Hoffman has some thoughts, of her own and of Tom Brevoort's, over at Robot 6).

At any rate, this is an interesting and pretty unexpected creative team. I'm sort of interested to see what Robinson can do now that he's not writing under the DC Comics of the Dan DiDio era (His pre-DiDio DC Comics were certainly a lot better than the ones he was writing since he returned to the company), and now that he's paired with such a strong artist for a collaborator (His Justice League of America writing struck me as extremely uneven, I think in large part because of the differences in his collaborators, their relative skill levels, and the general incompatibility of their art styles to one another). This is probably one I'll check out in trade, though. After I read Matt Fraction and Jonathan Hickman's runs in trade, first, of course.
...

The "compassionate INVISIBLE WOMAN"...? Oy.

Oh hey, check this out:
Alex Ross cover! Haven't seen him much at the Big Two lately; I was hoping he'd contribute covers to the All-New Invaders (also by Robinson)

MS. MARVEL #1

G. WILLOW WILSON (W)
 ADRIAN ALPHONA (A)

Cover by SARA PICHELLI 

Variant Cover by Art Adams
...

The legend has returned!
 Marvel Comics presents the all-new MS. MARVEL, the ground breaking heroine that has become an international sensation! Kamala Khan is just an ordinary girl from Jersey City--until she is suddenly empowered with extraordinary gifts. But who truly is the all-new Ms. Marvel? Teenager? Muslim? Inhuman? Find out as she takes the Marvel Universe by storm, and prepare for an epic tale that will be remembered by generations to come. History in the making is NOW!

32 PGS./Rated T+ ...$2.99

Oh, is there going to be a new, teenage Muslim Ms. Marvel? I hadn't heard anything about this anywhere yet.

It's really too bad the book is getting all this media attention now, as the book's ready to be ordered by retailers, but consumers can't buy copies yet, and, come February of 2014, the story will likely be completely forgotten by "civilians" who might want to buy a copy just to see what all the hubbub on the TV news or Colbert Report or wherever was about (Hey, by the way, did Dust get this much attention when she debuted way back in 2002? I don't remember "Marvel teenage Muslim superhero" being that big a deal back then...)

I suspect the book will need the help, because G. Willow Wilson isn't popular enough a writer to sell a monthly superhero book on her own, Adrian Alphona isn't popular enough an artist to sell a monthly superhero book on his own and the Ms. Marvel character has struggled to support a monthly on and off over the last few years, and that was when it was the original character, and not a brand-new legacy character. (And ugh, aren't the Marvels complicated enough? The last Ms. Marvel is now Captain Marvel III or IV or V or something, of Marvel's Captain Marvel, not DC's Captain Marvel, who is now Shazam, and not to be confused with MarvelMan, who was based on DC's Captain Marvel, and who Marvel now owns, but they're calling MiracleMan. This is a brand-new Ms. Marvel, whose name might change at any moment, and probably will).

I generally like Wilson's comics writing (never tried her prose), and I really like Alphona's writing, and this is the rare Marvel book priced at the "try me" price point of $2.99, so I plan to give it a try, but I don't have a lot of faith in its ability to last even as long, as, say, Daredevil, FF or Young Avengers, the books I was buying from Marvel that are apparently going away, perhaps to be relaunched as new books with different creative teams, perhaps not.

The image above, by the way, is the Adams variant, not the Supergirl homage/rip-off one.

NEW WARRIORS #1

CHRISTOPHER YOST (W) MARCUS TO (A)

Cover by RAMON PEREZ

...

WARRIORS REBORN! Adventurers SPEEDBALL and JUSTICE have come together with a group of young heroes including NOVA, SUN GIRL, and HUMMINGBIRD (and even a couple of new faces) to stop the latest threat to the Marvel Universe—the Atlanteans, Inhumans, clones and hundreds of other so-called "superior" beings are living among the humans of the Marvel Universe, but not everyone is pleased about it. THE HIGH EVOLUTIONARY has raised an army to combat the evolution of humanity – and the New Warriors are locked in his sights!

32 PGS./Rated T+ ...$3.99

Which character is Hummingbird? None of those characters look like someone named Hummingbird.

I really like Christopher Yost and Marcus To, but have no real interest in the New Warriors, Speedball or Justice.

And I have absolutely zero interest in a $3.99 book.

Maybe I'll check out the trade someday from the library, assuming it's easy enough to figure out which New Warriors Vol. 1 book collects this particular volume of the series...?


Hey, check it out! Richard Isanove's arc on Savage Wolverine features Wolverine turning into a Boat-a-taur. I think that's the proper term for someone who is a man from the waist up, and a boat from the waist down.

SHE-HULK #1

CHARLES SOULE (W) • JAVIER PULIDO (A)

Cover by KEVIN WADA

...
JENNIFER WALTERS IS...THE SHE-HULK! A stalwart Avenger, valued member of the FF, savior of the world on more than one occasion, she's also a killer attorney with a pile of degrees and professional respect. A 7-foot-tall drink of cool, emerald water, she's tough enough to knock out Galactus with one punch (possibly?) and has a heart bigger than the moon. But juggling cases and kicking bad guy butt is starting to be a little more complicated than she anticipated. With a new practice, a new paralegal and a mounting number of super villains she's racking up as personal enemies, She Hulk might have bitten off a little more than she can chew...but she just calls that that Tuesday.

32 PGS./Rated T+ ...$2.99

I really like the character She-Hulk in general, and particularly enjoyed the Dan Slott-written version of her book, which this one seems to be rather evocative of. Pulido sure is a great artist, too. I've read rather little of Soule's work but I haven't liked what I've read so far (the first two issues of Superman/Wonder Woman, a couple of the Villains Month one-shots for DC). But I do plan to give this issue a shot (Again, it's priced to try).

As with Ms. Marvel, this character's history doesn't suggest she'll have an easy time of maintaining a monthly for long, so I think much will depend on whether or not this turns out to be great enough to get a devoted, vocal following pretty much right out the gate. 




STAR-LORD: ANNIHILATION — CONQUEST

KEITH GIFFEN (W) • TIMOTHY GREEN II (A)

Cover by NIC KLEIN

• Peter Quill is Star-Lord once more, but will he embrace his legacy?

• The techno-organic Phalanx have overrun the galaxy, and it's time for Star-Lord and his ragtag team of cosmic cult favorites — including Bug, Captain Universe, Deathcry, Mantis, Groot and Rocket Raccoon — to suit up and become legends!

• But this no-win, no-tech suicide mission starts off bad and rapidly gets worse.

• As hordes of the Phalanx close in, one team member might have to make the supreme sacrifice!

• Relive the birth of the motley crew that became the Guardians of the Galaxy!

• Collecting ANNIHILATION: CONQUEST — STARLORD #1-4.
104 PGS./Rated T+ ...$7.99

So this is basically the four-issue, Annihilation: Conquest series during which writer Keith Giffen mixed-and-matched various Marvel cosmic characters and ended up inventing the current version of Guardians of the Galaxy; this book lead pretty directly into the Guardians of the Galaxy monthly series by Dan Abnett, Andy Lanning and company, which was just relaunched as a Brian Michael Bendis-written, movie cash-in comic.  I think it's pretty safe to say that were it not for this series, the next team movie from Marvel Studios wouldn't be Guardians of the Galaxy, but maybe New Warriors or something.

Anyway, if you haven't read this series yet, but are at all interested in these character, do check this out. Good, solid writing blending action with a sense of humor and excellent art. And at $7.99, you get 100 pages of great comics for the price of 40-44 decompressed, not-as-good pages of the current Guardians comic.


THE SUPERIOR FOES OF SPIDER-MAN VOL. 1: GETTING THE BAND BACK TOGETHER TPB

Written by NICK SPENCER

Penciled by STEVE LIEBER

Cover by MARCOS MARTIN

It's a new sleeper-hit series starring some of Spidey's deadliest baddies! Boomerang and his fellow villains prove that with terrible powers come terrible responsibilities, and Spider-Man will soon learn that with superior villains come superior problems! Out on bail and aiming to stay out of jail, Boomerang must get his cronies on target — but does Frank Castle, the one-man army known as the Punisher, have them targeted already? The Foes have a plan and the means to pull it off, but they're about to learn the hard way that you can't steal the head of Silvermane without severe repercussions! Rising star Nick Spencer teams with Eisner Award-winning sensation Steve Lieber for a walk on the Spider-Verse's evil side! Collecting SUPERIOR FOES OF SPIDER-MAN #1-6.
136 PGS./Rated T+ ...$16.99

I heartily endorse this product.


I kinda like this Thunderbolts cover by Julian Totino Tedesco. 

WOLVERINE #1 & 2
PAUL CORNELL (W) • RYAN STEGMAN (A/C)

...
WOLVERINE NO MORE?
After the events of KILLABLE, Wolverine has something to prove. Before he can take on Sabretooth again, he'll need to build himself back up, get better and stronger than he's ever been...but it's not as easy as he thought, and he'll soon find himself turning to other means of revenge when the normal channels don't seem to be working fast enough. Can he fight back his demons, or is this the beginning of a Wolverine who's gone to the dark side?
32 PGS./PARENTAL ADVISORY ...$3.99

See? How exactly "All-New" is this?

If they really plan to reboot the series with a new #1 every couple story arcs, they really should just cancel Wolverine and go the old Hellboy route of a series of miniseries...that way, they can do a #1 every 4-6 issues, and the trade collections would be a little easier to follow, you know?

I'm not entirely sure how I feel about the new costume, if that's what Wolvie will be wearing now, but I guess it looks pretty good in that particular image.

WOLVERINE AND THE X-MEN #41 & 42
JASON AARON (W) • NICK BRADSHAW & PEPE LARRAZ (A)

Cover by NICK BRADSHAW

SCHOOL'S OUT FOREVER! FINAL ISSUES!

• It's the end of the year for the Jean Grey school – but where do our graduates go from here? And who will have survived the experience?!

• Jason Aaron, Pepe Larraz & Nick Bradshaw bring the story of the Jean Grey school to a close!
32 PGS. (EACH)/Rated T ...$3.99 (EACH)

Oh. I was wondering how Jason Aaron was going to write two X-Men books with an overlap in cast members at the same time. I guess this explains how he'll manage writing Wolverine and The X-Men and The Amazing X-Men

I guess I can start reading WatXM in trade now, huh? Or should I just wait for an omnibus at this point...?



X-Men #10.NOW and #11
Brian Wood (W) Kris Anka (A)
...
AN ALL-NEW SISTERHOOD! The X-Men have taken down super villains, aliens and their own future selves...but never all at the same time! Lady Deathstrike has put together an all new Sisterhood, her own illuminati to take down the X-Men and take over the world. Recruiting the likes of Typhoid Mary and Enchantress, her cabal go on a global hunt for the most powerful of them all...an enemy who holds the X-Men responsible for her almost-destruction. Meanwhile, M settles in and Rachel comes to terms with her relationship with Sublime.

32 PGS. (EACH)/Rated T+ ...$3.99 (EACH)

Sisterhood! This certainly isn't the forum to get into the whole Brian Wood thing (and if by "whole Brian Wood thing" you don't know what I mean, here's Heidi MacDonald recapping Tess Fowler's discussion of it and offering commentary, and here's Wood's response), in large part because I don't think anyone really cares what I personally think of the situation, but I did want to note the irony of reading a solicitation seemingly promoting Wood's X-Men comic as the "girl power" X-Men comic on the very same day I read Wood's statement on Tess Fowler's account of an encounter with him, and some of the attendant discussion (I guess "sisterhood" is, here, a proper noun, but, just scanning through and seeing the "AN ALL-NEW SISTERHOOD!" at the beginning, right after the all-lady line-up on the cover, it looks like Marvel again promoting this as the lady X-Men, despite Wood's repeated protestations that it's supposed to be just another X-Men book that happens to have a bunch of ladies in it).

It's sort of a shame, because I had just recently gotten over seeing Wood's name attached to a comics project and thinking, "Oh, the guy who always argues online about whether his comics sell better than the sales figures publishers release publicly or not" and had started thinking instead, "Oh, the guy who wrote that promising Star Wars comic that turned out to be kind of boring and the all-woman X-Men comic." But now I see his name and I think, "Oh, that guy who tried to pick up an aspiring comics creator in a way that was either super-sleazy and unethical or awkward and dumb, depending on whose side of the story is the most accurate" (Again, I don't know, and no one should really care what I think either way. It sounds like Wood didn't really do anything illegal or monstrous so much as sleazy and scummy, if there was an actual or just suggested or implied quid pro quo. What's weird is it sounds like the "casting couch" sort of scenario, which is super-weird in that Comics is no Hollywood,  and, even using that metaphor, Wood wouldn't be the comics equivalent of a studio mogul, director, producer, casting agent or star...maybe a character actor? And that's today, as the writer of the fourth or fifth most-important X-Men comic and a licensed Star Wars comic; in his statement, he says he had "very little professional power or industry recognition at the time," so maybe he would have been more of a TV movie actor in the Hollywood casting couch sceneario...?).

Anyway: Brian Wood—threat or menace?

I do wonder what sort of impact that story will have on sales of this particular title, as a large segment of its most ardent fans seem to be female readers, creators and aspiring creators drawn to the powerful female characters in its line-up and it's promise of an all-female cast. These are readers who are pretty engaged with the comics industry and how female-friendly or unfriendly it still is in the 21st century.

Thursday, November 14, 2013

Meanwhile...

I've only got two reviews appearing elsewhere this week, but they are both of excellent works. First, go to Good Comics For Kids for a write-up of Fantagraphics' Floyd Gottfredson's Walt Disney's Mickey Mouse Color Sundays Vol. 1: Call of the Wild, then head on over to Robot 6 for a review of Anders Nilsen's latest book, Rage of Poseidon.

Wednesday, November 13, 2013

DC's February previews reviewed

February seemed like a quiet-ish month to me, despite it being the penultimate one for DC's Forever Evils series, and its many tie-ins (I like how "Blight" showed up in Constantine and some of the other magic-hero titles, as a tie-in to the crossover that is itself a crossover).

One thing that did jump out at me was multiple references to "steampunk variants," which seems like a rather Marvel-like thing to do (Themed variants, that is). I suppose it will be interesting to see what DC comes up with for those, if they're common enough that I'll even get to see them. Steampunk versions of various DC superheroes seems like something that occurs naturally on the Internet, so I'm curious to see what "official" versions might look like.

Anyway, to take a look at everything that DC plans to publish in February of next year, you can click here. Otherwise, carry on reading this post.


ALL-STAR WESTERN #28
Written by JUSTIN GRAY and JIMMY PALMIOTTI
Art by MORITAT
Cover by DARWYN COOKE
On sale FEBRUARY 26 • 32 pg, FC, $3.99 US • RATED T+
Old West meets modern medicine! Are Hex’s scars healed? Trapped in a future he’s still coming to grips with, Jonah Hex confronts his own history as he uncovers a museum dedicated to the scarred bounty hunter’s days in the Old West.

Jonah Hex's plastic surgery adventure...? Okay, I haven't read every Jonah Hex story ever written or anything, but I'm pretty sure this isn't one that's been done before.



BATWOMAN #28
Written by MARC ANDREYKO
Art by JEREMY HAUN
Cover by TREVOR McCARTHY
...
On sale FEBRUARY 19 • 32 pg, FC, $2.99 US • RATED T+
...
As Batwoman reels from Maggie’s surprising revelation last issue, the two must work together to discover the secret of the Wolf Spider. Who hired him and what are his deadly plans for Gotham?

Maggie's surprising revelation...? What could that—OH MY GOD MAGGIE IS A GIANT SPIDER!!! No wonder they can't get married. If they did, Maggie would then have to eat Batwoman alive on their wedding night.


EARTH 2 #20
Written by TOM TAYLOR
Art by BARRY KITSON
Cover by JAE LEE
...
On sale FEBRUARY 5 • 32 pg, FC, $2.99 US • RATED T
Retailers: This issue will ship with two covers. Please see the order form for more information.
Superman’s plans for Earth 2 finally come to light as Batman, Hawkgirl and Red Tornado join a new ally who could turn the tide in the war with Apokolips.

If that's Tsunami, she's pretty cool-looking...at least as drawn by cover artist Jae Lee. You know, this book seems to be drifting further and further afield from its original pitch as the New 52 version of the JSA, with an evil Superman, a new Batman and Lois Lane in the body of an android Red Tornado...



FOREVER EVIL #6
Written by GEOFF JOHNS
Art by DAVID FINCH and RICHARD FRIEND
Cover by DAVID FINCH
...
On sale FEBRUARY 19 • 32 pg, 6 OF 7, FC, $3.99 US • RATED T • Combo pack edition: $4.99 US
...
The final fate of Nightwing! The most unlikely of allies have set the Crime Syndicate in their sights — and they’re playing for keeps while the life of a hero hangs in the balance! Plus, the identity of the mysterious man in the hood is finally revealed!

Wow, has there ever been a big, line-wide crossover event series with duller covers than those that Finch has been providing for Forever Evil? That's six in a row with no background at all; the previous five were just various group shots of villains not doing much of interest (Marching, punching, posing).

I'm not worried about "the final fate of Nightwing," as DC has a lot of more redundant characters to kill off before they get to Dick Grayson (Jason "Red Hood" Todd and Tim "Red Robin" Drake, for example, and that's just among Batman's former sidekicks). If they do kill him off in this series, then I imagine that's a pretty clear sign that they've already decided to reboot The New 52, either a re-reboot, or more likely a partial de-reboot, in which the good stuff from The New 52 is retained as the old DCU continuity is returned.

I sincerely hope that "the mysterious man in the hood" isn't Earth 3's Lex Luthor, as that would be way too obvious.

FOREVER EVIL: ARKHAM WAR #5
Written by PETER J. TOMASI
Art by SCOT EATON and JAIME MENDOZA
Cover by JASON FABOK
...
On sale FEBRUARY 5 • 32 pg, 5 of 6, FC, $2.99 US • RATED T
Retailers: This issue will ship with two covers. Please see the order form for details.
Bane must face Scarecrow’s army of criminal psychopaths who have been enhanced by his Venom toxin! The fate of Gotham City hangs in the balance as Bane faces odds even he might not be able to beat!

Wait, we just saw a bunch of Batman villains all hopped-up on Venom in the first story arc of the New 52 Batman: The Dark Knight...!

You know, looking at Fabok's version of Killer Croc there, I wonder if he knows the Venom being referred to is a sort of super-steroid, and, not the Marvel symbiote, because Croc's sure looking awfully drooly and long-tongued...




Here are your New 52 Metal Men, as drawn by Ivan Reis on the cover for Justice League #28. They could have been worse. Just looking at this image, Mercury is the only one who seems wrong, but the longer I look at the image and think about it, I guess I don't see any real reason for them to look quite so robotic.. If the Metal Men are still shape-changers—and Mercury at least seems to be—then there's no real reason for them to have armor plating and look quite so built, unless they want to, for some reason.


The only thing I really like about this cover of Jim Lee's for Superman Unchained, in which it looks like New 52 Wonder Woman and Superman are teaming up with a life-size Batman action figure to fight an off-model Darkseid (that's new character Wraith though)? That they wrecked the logo in the melee. Or maybe Wraith attacked the logo on purpose: "Superman Unchained? What kind of dumb title for a Superman comic is that? Rraagh!"

Tuesday, November 12, 2013

I just saw Thor: The Dark World.

Whoever dressed Alexander for the premiere was more daring and imaginative than whoever designed Sif's costume for the movie.
THE BAD:

—The general, action-driving plot really seemed like it was still in pre-first draft, "just spit-balling here" form. As I understood it, long, long ago in a Lord of the Rings-style, Anthony Hopkins-narrated prologue, an army of space orcs had gotten their hands on a powerful, existence-ending weapon, but before they could use it, Odin's dad and his army wiped them all out. This one guy was like, "Hey, should we destroy this weapon or something?" But Odin's dad was all like, "No, let's just hide it somewhere no one will ever find it."

Instead of putting it in the Asgard weapons vault where they kept the maguffin from the first Thor movie—The basic plot of the two movies was pretty much identical, right? Ill-defined ancient weapon from their super-viking ancestors falling into the wrong hands?—or even a safety deposit box or a rented storage unit or a high school locker with a combination lock from K-Mart, they just stuck it in the middle of an abandoned warehouse in a dodgy part of London?

And then the weapon gets stuck inside Thor's girlfriend and the space orcs awaken from hibernation and want to get it back and so there's a bunch of fighting.

—Both Thor movies have big, expansive, awesome supporting casts...and little for any of them to do. Renee Russo as Thor's mom has a lot more to do here (I just had to check IMDb to see if she was even in the first movie), as does Idris Elba as Heimdall, but poor Sif (Jaimie Alexander; see above) and the Warriors Three don't have any more to do then they didn't have to do last time. Each gets at least one decent, several seconds-long scene, and Zachary Levi's Fandral gets a few quips, but they're all fairly wasted. Poor Hogun the Grim's entire contribution to the film is telling Thor early on that he's pretty much gonna sit this film out, thanks.

I guess Marvel will have to do a spin-off if The Warriors Three are ever really going to get their due. Given how much people seem to love Tom Hiddleston's Loki, maybe they'll eventually do a Loki or Tales of Asgard movie, just featuring Hiddleston, Sif and the Warriors Three, with Thor and Odin sitting the movie out...?

Ooh, or maybe they could do a Sif and The Warriors Three show on cable? That would certainly be a lot less boring than Agents of SHIELD show looks, right? Marvel meets Game of Thrones, winds up somewhere in the vicinity of Hercules: The Legendary Journeys/Xena: Warrior Princess...?

—I thought the Cursed (Or was it spelled Kursed?) looked pretty dumb. His mask reminded me a bit of the one the Predator wears, which is kinda weird, because the alien runes flashing in the space orc ship look like the red alien writing that appears in Predator ships.

—As with Iron Man 3, and, I suspect, all of the post-Avengers Marvel "Cinematic Universe" films from here on out, this one suffered a bit from leaving unanswered the question of just where the hell the rest of the superheroes were.

I mean, there was a straight-up alien invasion of London, and no one shows up but Thor and two fighter jets? Where was Iron Man? Where was the Hulk? Where was Nick Fury and SHIELD? Once you establish the fact that these guys all know each other and occasionally get together to defend major cities from alien invasions (and repeatedly make reference to that throughout your film), it feels a little...weird when no one shows up to help Thor save London from alien invasion.

—Needed more shirtless Hemsworth.

Yes, he looks good shirtless or in a cape and armor, but he cleans up nice too.
THE GOOD:

—I liked the creepy white masks the space orc footsoldiers wore. High-five, whoever designed those!

—Pretty much all of the performances were either really good, or rather effective for conveying what little emotional content they were called on to portray.

Hiddleston stole the show; the audience I saw it with laughed at pretty much every line of dialogue he was given. Kat Denning was a definite highlight, and, I think, was to Natalie Portman's Jane Foster what Hiddleston's Loki was to Hemsworth's Thor: Someone more vibrant and engaging you would prefer to see a movie about (Really glad they not only had her return, but gave her more to do this time around).

Portman was good, and gave the movie some star power and all (ditto Anthony Hopkins), but her character seemed almost crowded out of the film. There's just not enough room to explore her character and her character's relationship with Thor, even though that's meant to be the emotional core of the film franchise. Ah well.

I do kinda wish Hopkins wasn't playing Odin though; I would love to see what a Liam Neeson Odin woulda been like.

—The big battle sequence in which the space orcs attack Asgard was pretty awesome. I liked their ships, and the way those ships moved around, and the mixing of the sci-fi and fantasy elements into something that felt appropriate, like if you squinted one eye and titled your head, you could see how all of these figures would have seemed like gods and monsters to some, and if you squinted the other eye and maybe tilted your head the other way, they just seemed like space aliens.

The battle, with its whizzing, rotating space ships that resembled giant flying swords, really reminded me of Star Wars, and the entire sequence had a sort of Star Wars + Lord of the Rings aesthetic and feel to it.

—I think they managed to find an Iron Man-like tone to this film a bit better than in the original. There's a lot of quipping and sarcasm, sure, but there's a light touch to almost everything, including the apocalyptic battle between the forces of light and dark at the end of the film. Despite the serious, even grim title, Thor: The Dark World was fun.

—Thor hanging his hammer on the coat rack was maybe my favorite part of the film. That was the point where I thought, "Yes, this $5 bill and few hours of your life was well spent, Caleb!"

—Stellan SkarsgÃ¥rd nude scene!

How weird is it that for all the gorgeous human beings in this movie that millions of people would enjoy seeing, and happily pay money for the opportunity to see, in various states of undress—Hemsworth and Hiddleston for the ladies, Portman, Denning and Jaimie Alexander for the gentleman—it was SkarsgÃ¥rd who had the only nude scene, and plays  the only character that spent the majority of the film not wearing any pants?


Oh, and let's make sure Denning's character appears in that Thor-less spin-off movie I was imagining earlier, okay?
SO, THAT MID-CREDITS TEASER?

Honestly, I was kind of hoping for Rocket Raccoon, but I have to admit to being surprised to the point of shock with that particular character appearing. I'm assuming that's setting up something in Guardians of the Galaxy or Avengers 3, but, well, that's just not one of the top, say, 75 Marvel characters I would think to see appearing in a movie in any capacity at all.

The scene is short, but holy smokes it really seemed like part of an entirely different Cinematic Universe than the one all the Marvel Studios films up until this point have shared.

Sunday, November 10, 2013

Some picture books of note:

Mustache Baby (Clarion Books; 2013): Writer Bridget Heos and artist Joy Ang tell the story of Billy, a little baby born with an unusual feature: A full head of gingery hair. Oh, and a matching mustache. Alarmed, Billys parent's looked to the nearby nurse, who told them they'll have to wait and see "whether it is a good-guy mustache or a bad-guy mustache," and Ang draws a bushy gray, cookie-duster style mustache with a halo floating over it and a long, dark mustache curled up at the ends, bearing red devil horns and a red, spaded tale emanating from it.

It sure looks like a good-guy mustache, and Billy's behavior is determined by the style of his mustache. At first, he plays cowboy for four pages. Then there's a two-page spread filled with pictures of Billy with various mustaches, each determining his temperament and style of play: circus ringleader, Spanish painter, etc (near the edges of the page, we get fragments of two pictures, one suggested mustache baby is a Mario-style plumber/adventurer, wearing a red shirt and blue coveralls and carrying a plunger, but we can't see if he's wearing a matching hat or not, the other showing him shirtless and in orange pants, with a long Fu Manchu mustache, suggesting he's a kung fu master). Then there's another sequence in which he plays cop, as his mustache changes shape into a policeman's mustache.

And then comes the first of the book's two strongest visuals. There's a five page sequence which begins with the words, "But a funny thing happened. As Billy got bigger..."

The page is dominated by an over-the-shoulder view of the right-half of Billy's head, his eyes facing away from us, and only the right edge of his mustache visible  peeking around his cheek. The background is a bright, pale green field.

Turn the page, and a two-page spread is revealed, the "camera" seemignly zooming in on Billy's face, so we see him in the same angle, but now the mustache has grown longer, and the background is a darker orange. Turn the page again, and there's another two-page spread, this one even closer up, and the edges of his still-longer mustache has curled up, while the background bleeds from a dark red to a darker and darker shadowed red, becoming black in the upper right corner.

"His parents' worst fears were realized. Billy had a..." turn the page for the dramatic reveal, "BAD-GUY mustache."

This leads him to misbehave for a while, but, like his other mustaches, it changes again, and his mother tells him, "There, there...Everybody has a bad-mustache day now and then."

I'm fairly fascinated by the premise of the book, that mustache style determines behavior, rather than the reverse, that people with particular occupations or outlooks might generally wear a particular style of mustache, that would then become associated with them. I kinda like the idea that a mustache style, like a new hairstyle for a woman, can determine not only the way you might be perceived, but your very behavior (I've never found this to be the case, having only worn about four different mustaches: A  thin cookie-duster, a Hitler/Chaplin (for an afternoon, spent entirely around the house and seen by no one but my roommates), a Chester A. Arthur mustache/muttonchops combo and a waxed, pointy, up-turned villainous mustache. At no point did I feel anti-semitic/like a little tramp, presidential or villainous.

Aside form that five-page, three "panel" sequence of mustache transformation, the book's other great gag comes on the last page, but I won't spoil it. Suffice it to say that Heos and Ang have some diverting ideas about the nature of facial hair, and even if one isn't amused by all of their gags, many of which failed to strike me, there are a few bits of execution that are easy to admire.

The Gunniwolf (E.P. Dutton; 1970): This is a very old book. The copyright on the illustrations, by William Wiesner, are copyright dated 1967. The text copyright date is 1918 and 1946, and I suspect the story is still older, as author Wilhelmina Harper's credit says "Retold by" rather than simply "by" or "written by."

A (very) little bit of online research seems to indicate that Harper did not invent the story, but that it was an older American folktale, sometimes said to be Appalachian in origin, at other times to be African-American, but I couldn't find a definitive answer to its origins. Harper was a librarian as well as a writer, and this version is apparently the one she used in her story times.

The story is quite simple. A little girl who lives alone with her mother near the jungle is one day left alone, with the instruction to never, ever go near the jungle. Picking flowers, the little girl keeps seeing more and more beautiful flowers closer and closer to the jungle, and, before she knows it, she's rather deep into the jungle and approached by The Gunniwolf, a large, quadrapedal predator animal/monster.

He demands she stay still and sing for him, and she does...until he falls asleep. At which point she bolts and, waking, he pursues, asking her why she's moved away. She denies doing so, and, again upon his demand, she sings again, and he falls asleep. This happens several times until she is safely home.

I was attracted to the book—which I had never encountered as a child myself—by the cover and the title. Wiesner's Gunniwolf, whatever exactly that is, looks like a very large wolf, but with a man and tail like a lion. Inside, where there are many more, clearer pictures of the Gunniwolf, we see that it also has tufts of fur about it's ankles (almost as if it were a very shaggy animal shaved somewhat like a large poodle), and that it's mane drapes rather far down.

I was curious about the animal, but there's no real information about him in the book: He lives in the jungle, he can talk, he likes the sound of a little girl singing and he seems to be pretty sleepy, perhaps even narcoleptic.

The appeal of the story, it seems, is in its sounds, and it is a book meant to be told aloud to children, as in addition to repeating bits of action—the sing, sleep, run, chase, catch and repeat cycle of events—nonsense-like, sing-songy words are repeated for certain actions.

The girl sings "Kum-kwa, khi-wa," she runs "pit-pat, pit-pat," and the Gunniwolf runs "hunker-cha, hunker-cha."

This telling makes the origins of the story seem older than American, but perhaps those elements were just the flourishes of the storytellers who told it before Harper, and, here choices made by Wiesner.
The action takes place near a jungle, rather than a woods or forest. The dark-haired girl looks like she might be Asian, and her mother wears a shawl that covers her head and carries a jug of water that seem to place her somewhere around the setting of The Jungle Book, I would have guessed as a child.

The syllables the girl sings certainly sound more Eastern than Western, and the way she and the Gunniwolf talk certainly isn't perfect English. "Little Girl, why for you move?" he asks her. And she responds, "I no move." And he responds, "Then you sing that guten sweeten song again."

Regardless of its origins, I really like Wiesner's artwork, particularly the design of the Gunniwolf, who seems as playful and mischievous as he does scary, particularly when he falls asleep, and grows particularly anthropomorphic.

Halloween (Little, Brown and Company; 2002): Well, this is a weird little book. Written by Jerry Seinfeld and illustrated by James Bennett, it reads very much like a kid-friendly stretch of a Seinfeld stand-up routine*, focusing on Halloween (And by "kid-friendly" I mean not only is it not blue—does Seinfeld even ever work blue?—it doesn't concern itself with the social mores of the adult world that seems to be Seinfeld's comedy at its most Seinfeldian).

It's therefore not entirely a story, at least not as much as it is a series of anecdotes, with an introduction/conclusion structure based on the somewhat dubious assertion that children being able to consume a great deal of candy is something extraordinary enough to bear comparison to Superman (and/or be worthy of a story book at all).

So Seinfeld discusses how much he loved candy as a child, and how all-consuming his passion for consuming it was, and the joy of originally discovering the concept of trick-or-treating ("What is this? What did you say? Someone's giving out candy? Who's giving out candy? Everyone we know is just giving out candy?"). He talks a bit about costumes, and I wondered after a passage in which he discusses the sorts that came with the hard plastic face masks and plastic cellophane smocks, of a sort that only parents of a certain age would be able to relate to (Although his complaints about having to cover up his Superman costume with a coat are perhaps something more relatable to today's kids).

Superman figures rather prominently in the story, so much so that the small print includes a Superman created by  Jerry Siegel and Joe Shuster credit, a copyright and trademark notation that he is DC Comics', and that he is here being "Used with permission."

Artist James Bennett, a prolific illustrator who has had his work published in Mad magazine, gets a few chances to draw Superman, appearing in a store display advertising Superman Halloween costumes, and in a pair of fantasy sequences, through young Jerry Seinfeld's imagination.

Bennett is good at what he does, but his isn't a style I'm particularly fond of. Here it's something between that of a caricature artist and a fine painter, and I found his Jerry Seinfeld-as-a-little boy rather disturbing, given how much it looks like Seinfeld, but not, like some sort of cloned, homunculus version of the comedian.

Halloween: Is It For Real? (Tommy Nelson; 1997): It was the title that got me on this one. I just liked the sound of it. It made me laugh. Like, what exactly is it asking? Is Halloween a real holiday? Yes, obviously it is. Is everything people say about Halloween for real? Uh, I don't know; does anyone say much of anything about Halloween?

The confused looking little kid on illustrator Jane Kurisu's cover sure looks confused about something. Is she or he wondering if that ghost and that witch are real? Or if He or she is really a cat now?

The "note to parents" from author Harold Myra on the first page only made me more interested:
Halloween is an odd mixture of creepy creatures, costume parties, and harvest fetivals. It is a confusing holiday for Christians.
Okay, sold. I checked it out of the library and took it home for me. I understand that "Halloween" has a somewhat shaky reputation in some public spaces and places now, specifically because some Christian faiths object to it. I'm not particularly well-traveled, but even I've been around more than a few institutions that forbid its celebration in any way, or at least have done away with the word, using things like "Fall Festival" or "Harvest Party" to describe a day of events that might include, say, dressing up in costumes and trick-or-treating.

I was raised in the Catholic faith, attending Catholic schools from Kindergarten through my last year of college,  but the tradition I grew up in has always been a very post-Vatican II one, so I am often both intrigued and bewildered by certain beliefs and practices of certain Christian sects or groups, particularly since "Christians" are generally referred to monolithically when discussed in the press.

Heck, even that intro—Halloween is a confusing holiday for Christians? Is it? I've lived my whole life around Christians, and I've never heard anyone express even the slightest bit of confusion regarding this wholly secular holiday (The closest I've come is in discussing holidays with a friend who was raised in the faith of the Jehovah's Witnesses; they don't celebrate any holidays, save an annual one around the time of Easter, not even their own birthdays).

So—Halloween, real or unreal?

Here's the rest of Myra's introduction:
Should parents encourage the celebration of a holiday that traces its roots to pagan practices and beliefs?
What, you mean like Christmas and Easter...?
The challenge for Christian parents is to each our children to use this holiday to celebrate God's victory over evil and evil spirits. It is my hope that this book will help.
That's a noble sentiment, really, and if the extremely devout can find a way to balance celebration of a fun, kids holiday with their faith that doesn't mean simply forbidding them to join in the innocent fun of the rest of the world, well, more power to them.

I was also kind of excited when I read that second-to-last sentence, as I wondered if this kids book might feature a section on The Harrowing of Hell, something I never heard of until reading about medieval legends and suchlike as a college student (That's the semi-apocryphal belief that, between dying on the cross on Good Friday and being resurrected on Easter Sunday, Jesus descended into hell, kicked Satan's ass, and freed all the virtuous pagans and/or everyone who had died up until that point, allowing them to ascend into heaven or purgatory or wherever. In some versions, Jesus even chains up Satan in hell, and hands governorship over to one of Satan's lieutenants or to angels. It's an awesome story that exists only as potential one in my imagination, really, as I've seen no real fleshed-out, dramatic version of it before. It's a story, but not a very detailed one, I guess).

Myra's story starts with a family—mom, dad and kids Greg, Todd and Michelle—discussing the fun parts of Halloween. On the second page, one of the kids ask why anyone celebrates it, and another chimes in that "Ive heard that it is called the devil's holiday."

"It all started long ago, before Christ was born," Dad explained. "People believed that a lord of death sent evil spirits into animals to play terrible tricks on people. To escape them, people wore disguises."

There aren't any sources listed at the back of the book (This is a 24-page picture book for children, rather than a scholarly work, I guess), so I can't really check on that. Personally, I always dated the pagan practices associated with Halloween—many of which I think are a sort of invented tradition, or at least partially invented to justify or explain traditions that the explainers don't really know the origins of anymore—to after the death of Christ, but I suppose that's simply my ignorance, born of a Western-centric understanding of world history.  The story of human history I've always been taught moves from the middle east to Greece and Rome before moving northward to Europe.

Dad explains that "Christians tried to change the holiday into a festival of joy" and that Halloween comes from All Hallow' Eve, with "All Hallows" meaning all holies or all the saints.

When one of the boys interjects that he thought the holiday was about ghosts, the parents explain that "It's about people who have died...But saints aren't ghosts. They're alive with Jesus, who rose from the dead and has a real body."

The kids host a Halloween party, and when the kids get talking to their friends, the subject of death comes up, and mom brings up heaven, "We miss our loved ones...But they're not sad. They're happy in a different world."

Man, I hope I have my hair back in heaven, and won't be as jowly as grandpa in that picture. I'd kinda like to be 19 again, physically, if that's alright.

When the party ends, everyone sings "Amazing Grace," and when the kids go to bed, they talk about feeling scared, and ask why people tell scary stories. Mom answers in a way that I sure as hell wouldn't want my mother to have answered any questions I might have had about monsters, Bigfoots, aliens, owl men and the other sorts of things I was scared of as a child:
"Most stories are told in fun," said Mom. "But there is a supernatural world."

"Evil spirits do exist. And temptations."
Temptations? No big deal. But what's all this about evil spirits? You mean to tell me that creaking sound right outside my bedroom window that dad said is just the tree branch rubbing against the phone line in the wind is definitely not a dinosaur or monster, but it might be an evil spirit?

The parents then teach the kids a Bible verse, 2 Timothy 1:7, "God did not give us a spirit that makes us afraid. He gave us a spirit of power and love." "If you memorize the verse, you can say it to yourself when you get scared," Dad tells the kids.

I'm not in love with that verse, and don't know if it woulda helped me when I was a terrified child trying to go to sleep at night, but I bet psychologically having a spell or mantra-like phrase to repeat over and over might have helped.

And that's pretty much the end, save for the happy ending last page.

Personally, I found the book a little over-preachy—I prefer my Christian messages to be more Chronicles of Narnia style than as overt as this—and don't think I would have dug it as a child, but I think the solution Myra comes up with is probably the best one: Embrace the fun parts of Halloween, but it, like anything else in the secular world, can be used as a springboard to remember or meditate on aspects of your faith.

Kurisu's art didn't do anything for me, and I don't think the book had to look as generic as it does, but then, this was a message-first, art-second sort of book, so it's not as surprising or disappointing as it is not what I would have most wanted to see in a book on the subject.

The Monsters' Monster (Little, Brown and Company; 2012): Cartoonist/children's author alert! This is the latest picture book from Patrick McDonnell, creator of Mutts, and therefore, likely the best cartoonist whose work is appearing on your local paper's funnies pages, depending on where you live and the exact roster of the cartoonists whose work is still appearing in your paper.

This particularly charming book, which steers clear of his Mutts characters and his usual animal cast, is a good book for the post-Halloween, pre-Thanksgiving part of fall, as it's contents and aesthetic are generally Halloween-esque, but it's moral more of a Thanksgiving-esque one.

A trio of cute little monsters named Grouch (a little devil in a red pair of long underwear, with a bulbous red nose and long, striated horns), Grump (a hairy, bean-shaped creature evocative of Captain Caveman, with horns and a spaded tail) and little Gloom 'n' Doom (the smallest monster, who looks a bit like a two-headed mime) all though they were the most monstrous monsters.

As it reads on McDonnel's first two-page spread, of a castle emanating exclamation points, swirls, lighning bolts and little swirls of angry emotion, on a barren hill above a peaceful, six-building town emanating sweat drops and exclamation points:
They lived in a dark monster castle, high atop a dark monster mountain, overlooking a monster-fearing village.
They're days were mostly occupied with being monstrous, and occasionally their monstering would get competitive, with the three fighting over who was the most monstrous. To settle the argument once and for all, they decide to build their own monster, a monster to end all monster.

They essentially build their own Frankenstein's monster, who dwarfs them all in size (he can lift all three in a single hug, and have room for another three monsters of their size in his arms). To their surprise, he's polite and kind and showed no inclination towards monstrosity:
"But Monster didn't think he was a monster," the text reads. "He didn't think he was anything...but thankful to be alive!"
After a suspenseful final act, Monster's disposition proves contagious, and he is able to convert the little monsters to his point of view, with the help of doughnuts and the beauty of the natural world.

It's always a treat to see McDonnell working so big, in the great big size and color that picture books allow him, and his beautiful, present line is on perfect display here. It's an additional treat to see him drawing monsters instead of cats and dogs and people, just for a refreshing change of pace.

Sally Gets A Job (Abrams; 2008): Another of  the late, Columbus-born Stephen Huneck's many Sally books, which also include Sally Goes to the Beach, Sally Goes to the Farm and so on, this one finds the titular Labrador retriever watching her family go off to work and school and wishing she could go to.

"Maybe I should get a job," Sally thinks. That's pages one and two. Most of the remainder of the book consists of Sally imagining different jobs she might like to do, and what might be good and bad about them; some of these are based on her interests (She likes digging, so perhaps she could be an archaeologist; on the other paw, she really likes bones, so maybe she should just focus on them and become a paleontologist).

Each occupation is generally accompanied by an image of Sally performing it, and many of these are quite humorous, thanks to Huneck's deadpan presentation of a perfectly normal, not-at-all anthropomorphized dog in a setting or performing an activity that a dog cannot. Like looking at the want ads, as she does on the cover, or, for example, driving a tractor:
Huneck's artwork is accomplished through the creation of woodblocks and, in the case of this particular book, colored pencil. Despite the obvious artifice involved—note the white lines in Sally's black coat approximating her hairiness—Huneck's style is very realistic in its portrayal of the character and settings, which gives the book much of its humor.

For example, at one point she thinks, "Though I have never seen one, I think it would be fun to be a hip-hop star." This is the picture that accompanies that page of text:
Yes Sally, that is exactly what a hip hop star is.

Ultimately, Sally realizes she already has the very best job of all.

....

No, no it's not children's book star.


Unicorn Things He's Pretty Great (Hyperion; 2013): EDILW favorite Bob Shea's latest is a great one. How great, well, the cover pretty much tells you everything you need to know about it: The characters, the conflict, the look and the brilliant colors (What an online image might not reveal is the twinkly glitter in the frosting on those cupcakes, the cover image reflecting a scene in the book when Unicorn literally makes it rain cupcakes, the silver ink on the little sparkles and the dotted motion lines, and the fact that cupcakes and title are slightly raised, giving the book a pleasing tactile feel).

The story is told by Goat, whose life is turned upside down upon the arrival of Unicorn, who, despite having one less horn than Goat, seemingly has a lot more going for him, like all of his magical powers, his wonderful prancing ability and the fact that he emanates rainbows.
Shea's Unicorn is basically a big, thick, white capital P with details drawn on, intimating a simple, even child-like drawing style. The other characters follow suit, although Goat is a little more complex in his basic body shape (Their friends/classmates consist of anthropomorphic versions of a puppy, a kitty, a slice of bread, an piece of fruit and a bear. Each is infinitely more simple than the stars, essentially being a colored shape with details drawn on; both he puppy and the kitty, for example, are mushroom shapes of color, with cat or dog ears, paws, tails and faces drawn on).

After repeatedly (and seemingly inadvertently) showing up Goat, one day Unicorn notices Goat eating pizza, and is shocked and delighted to discover goat cheese.

"What?! Goats have cheese? Unicorns don't have cheese." Unicorn continues to discover things about Goat of which he is jealous ("Whoa! What is up with your hooves? Those things are out of control!" "Oh, these? These bad boys are 'cloven.'"). Meanwhile, Unicorn reveals what he feels are his own shortcomings.
Naturally, the two discover that, for all of their apparent differences, they actually have a lot in common  and become friends.

Shea's artwork, is as simple and charming as ever, and the more careful use of color makes its sudden bursts—the bulk of which accompany Unicorn—all the more powerful. Adding to the contrast, Goat's dialogue is rendered in what looks like a generic type-writer font, usually black in color, with stress words rendered in blue or something appropriate (When he uses the word "gold, " for instance, the word is presented in gold type). Unicorn starts off all of his dialogue with a big, fancy font, each letter a different color, and surrounded my sparkles of magic.

This is probably my favorite children's book at the moment, and, of Shea's, I think it may be my favorite, although Cheetah Can't Lose is hard to beat, and I did so enjoy Dinosaur Vs. Bedtime...

Well, whether or not its Shea's best, it's safe to say that Unicorn Thinks He's Pretty Great is indeed pretty great. 

Up in Heaven (Doubleday; 2003): Hey, anyone who has ever had a pet die! Do you feel like bawling today? Well have I got a book for you!

Cynthia Rylant's Dog Heaven has long been my go-to comfort book when thinking about the loss of a dog, and/or as a way to comfort someone who has just lost their dog, and Emma Chichester Clark's Up In Heaven covers some similar ground, although there's more of a story to it, and Clark's book is set both on earth and in heaven.

I lost Yogi, my mother's dog from the time I was in college until last year or so (and who was my housemate for about a year near the end of her life; I drew her in a few comics from that time, as you can see here and here), to complications related to extremely old dog-age (She was pushing 18 when she died), and my nieces lost their beloved shih tzu to a horrible car accident a few months back, so, um, the death of dogs has unfortunately been on my mind too much of late.

So Clark's book started working on me immediately, as it shows a happy but now too-old dog in the park with the little boy she lived with:
Daisy was devoted to Arthur, but she couldn't keep up with him anymore.

She was slowing down because she was very, very old. And she didn't always feel well.

One night, she went to sleep as usual, but when she woke up...she was in heaven!
So I was bawling by page four; that is exactly how I used to wish and pray Yogi would go, but, unfortunately, there was a trip to the vet involved before she (hopefully) woke up in heaven.

Daisy finds herself in a bright, beautiful world not unlike Rylant's dog heaven, and she's as young and full of energy and free of pain as when she was younger. There are all sorts of other dogs up there that she befriends, and while the environment is all trees and fields and flowers, there are at least a few signs of human life: Furniture the dogs can sit on.

As happy as Daisy is, she continues to look in on poor Arthur, who is having a really rough time without his dog with him anymore. Daisy is able to try and comfort him though, by sending him dreams  of where she is, and how much fun she's having there, and while these comfort him for a while each morning, his melancholy soon returns. Finally, Daisy sends him a dream of her bringing him a puppy and, after thus showing him its okay with her if he gets another dog, he does, and names it Maisy after Daisy.

So in addition to imagining a heaven specifically suited for dogs, this book also imagines a continued relationship between the dead dog and her living humans. That is, in fact, the real thrust and drama of the book.
I really liked Clark's artwork, which is somewhat flat and cartoony or comic book-y in its design and rendering, although thoroughly fleshed out in generally bright and warm colors (Earth and heaven actually look much the same). While much of the story is told in regular prose-style sentences hovering above or within the images, she gives the characters dialogue balloons occasionally, and I like how heaven seems to exist in a sort of expanded, comic book thought bubble atop the images, as if it were an entire realm of character thought bubbles.

*Oh. No wonder it seems like a stretch of a Seinfeld stand-up routine. It's essentially an edited, illustrated version of a Halloween-themed routine.