Tuesday, August 06, 2013

So, who created Nightwing...?

Here's something I've been wondering about off and on over the course of the last month or so, ever since I saw the above credit at the beginning of Nightwing Vol. 2: Night of the Owls, which makes it pretty clear that Nightwing was created by Marv Wolfman and George Perez.

Now, please don't misunderstand me. I am not going to argue with the credit, and I'm happy those two men—both of whom are very talented men, whose work has certainly given me hours and hours of entertainment in my life—are recognized for their contribution to the character and I assume (or, perhaps I should say, hope) that such credits bring with them some sort of financial remuneration.

I am simply curious as to why some DC Comics heroes, for example, always have the names of their creators cited in comics they appear in, why some characters never have the names of their creators cited, and why some sometimes do and sometimes don't. There's probably a degree of legal reasons (There certainly is for the current way the credits for Superman's creators appear in Superman comics now, as not only are Jerry Siegel and Joe Shuster credited, but there's also a "By Special Arrangement with the Jerry Seigel Family" following it these days).

Nightwing seems like a particularly murky character for anyone to be assigned credit for creating, though.

The character Dick Grayson, the secret identity of the original Robin, who would grow up to abandon that identity and take on the new one of Nightwing, was created in 1940 by Bob Kane and Jerry Robinson and Bill Finger.

The superhero codename "Nightwing" was created by Edmond Hamilton and Curt Swan in a 1963 issue of Superman; it's the name that a disguised Superman takes on while fighting crime in The Bottle City of Kandor, where he has no superpowers, but operates as a sort of Kyrptonian version of Batman (with Jimmy Olsen in the sidekick role as Flamebird). That version of Nightwing was returned to repeatedly in the Silver Age (as in the story under the above cover).

And then in a 1984 issue of Tales of the Teen Titansm (not the one above, but that's the nicest cover image of the original costume I could find), Grayson finally sheds his Robin identity in favor of the codename Nightwing, complete a new costume.

That comic was written by Marv Wolfman and drawn by George Perez, so they get the creation credit. But they didn't create the character or the codename, merely assigned the latter to the former, and Perez created a new costume for him, although that's been changed repeatedly over the years, and, obviously, bears no real resemblance to what Nightwing is currently wearing (I'm not sure who designed his New 52 costume, but whether it was Jim Lee, who was originally credited as redesigning the whole universe, or one of the many other artists who helped him, it's worth noting that it is essentially a refinement of his previous costume, which was itself a refinement of the costume before that, and so on back to Perez's original, I suppose).

It seems then that more accurate credits would be something along these lines:
Dick Grayson created by Bob Kane, Jerry Robinson and Bill Finger

Nightwing created by Edmond Hamilton and Curt Swan

Dick Grayson-
as-Nightwing created by Marv Wolfman and George Perez

Nightwing's current costume designed by Jim Lee or Whoever
This particular character seems like one of the trickier and murkier when it comes to assigning aspects of creation, as there's over 40 years difference between the introduction of the character "Dick Grayson" and the introduction of his Nightwing identity and costume.

But Nightwing is hardly alone and having a knotty creation story. For example, how to deal with all of those Golden Age superheroes re-created as new versions in The Silver Age under Julius Schwartz's direction? You know, The Flash, The Green Lantern, The Atom, Hawkman?

Gardner Fox and Harry Lampert created a super-fast character named The Flash who wore a lightning bolt symbol over a red shirt in 1940, but Robert Kanighter, John Broome and Carmine Infantino created a whole new character with a different costume, keeping just the name, powers and the lightning bolt and red top.

Or, more dramatically, Martin Nodell and Bill Finger created their Green Lantern, a character who had the power to manipulate green energy channeled through magic ring he charged with a magic lantern the same year the original Flash debuted. But in the '60s, John Broome and Gil Kane gave a new character that name and some of the same powers, but with a vastly different back-story. And man, what about a character like Green Lantern Kyle Rayner, another new character with the codename of the original, but who spins out of the elaborate back-story that spun out of the second Lantern...?

I guess it just goes to show how collaborative these sorts of shared-universe, corporate super-comics can be.

I'm all for giving credit where credit's due, and money to creators whose creations are making money (Either because doing so is a contractual obligation or simply because there's so much money to throw around it wouldn't kill a movie studio to give the guys who forge their golden geese a coupla extra bucks here and there).

I'm just glad I'm not the guy who has to determine who created how much of what, and how to assign the credit.

Monday, August 05, 2013

Stupid local comic shop with their stupid 20% off all trades sale...

So I stopped by my local comic shop yesterday between errands in the neighborhood, intent on picking up the four new comics waiting for me in my file from the last Wednesday or so, and it turns out they're having a 20% off all books and trades sale! They practically put a gun to my head and forced me to pull out my credit card and buy an armful of trades because seriously, when's the next time I'm going to be able to buy so many books for so little money? That even beats the usual discount I get when I buy books from a certain online retailer!

So I'm getting all caught up on IDW's Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles ongoing (or mostly caught up, anyway; I have no idea where the two trades of "micro-series" and The Secret History of The Foot Clan fit in; those guys really need to publish a reading order/checklist for their many, hydra-like franchise lines of comics and collections), reading the third and, I think, final collection of the excellent Roger Langridge-written new Popeye series (And hey, check out that cover—That's Dave Sim!) and I finally broke down and bought Jim Silke's Jungle Girls, which appears to be—stay with me now—a book full of illustrations of jungle girls, by Jim Silke (Plus a bunch of words and photographs, which I think are about the girls he draws and paints or whatever; I haven't gotten that far yet).

Anyway, there goes a significant portion of my Sunday and Monday, including the time I would have spent preparing a post for Every Day Is Like Wednesday tonight.

Don't blame me, blame my comic shop—20% off! I can't not buy a half-dozen trades at that price!

Sunday, August 04, 2013

Let's over-analyze this Superman book display; Here's what they racked, and what I woulda racked

So the other day I was in my local big, chain bookstore location, and I passed this display of Superman-related books and suchlike, noting the particular titles. "Hey," I thought, "I could do a blog post about this," and took a terrible picture of it with my cell phone.

I assumed the idea of the display, which features a Jim Lee-drawn image of New 52 Superman as decoration and a few little tchochkes in boxes (replica kyrptonite was one, I think) in addition to various books, was to snag customers who may have had their interest in Superman piqued by this summer's Superman movie.

So I noted the exact contents of the display, and thought about how appropriate they might be to meeting that goal, and/or what versions of visions of the Man of Steel those choices might represent.

It wasn't until I'd spent a few hours over the course of a few evenings working on the post below that I realized that maybe, just maybe, the guiding principle of the display was simply "A bunch of Superman books that will fill up the display," and that the folks who filled it might not have been super-familiar with each of the items on it, nor were they operating under orders from their corporate headquarters or from suggestions made by DC or Warner Brothers.

Thinking back to displays I've been involved in assembling in past day-jobs, I realized that one set of displays—grocery store end-caps—were rigorously planned by corporate decision-makers, and we were given detailed "plan-o-grams" on what items to display where (with a little leeway for how we arrange them and which of our own products to highlight among the things on sale." Another day-job that involved displays, however, was at a past library job, and that often just meant sticking new books, any new books, on this particular rack, or a mystery, any mystery, as long as the book has a nice, presentable cover and wasn't all beat-to-hell, on a shelf.

So what I'm saying is, chances are, I may have over-thought things here. But hey, over-thinking the innocuous is kind of what this blog's all about, right? So here's me picking apart the selections on this particular display because...just because.

•The Last Days of Krypton by Kevin J. Anderson: This isn't a comic book, but a novel; actually, now that I look it up online to make sure I've got the author's name right, I see that it actually has a colon and a sub-title on the cover (along with a No shit tag-line, "Before there was Superman, there was Krypton") noting that this is, in fact, a novel.

I've never read, probably never will read it and can't imagine reading it, without being paid an awful lot of money to do so, for the purposes of reviewing it (I've pitched a column of book reviews of books about comics and/or prose adaptations of comics characters to a couple of places, but no one seems too terribly interested, and man, reviewing novels is some time-consuming stuff. That's one good thing about comics; like movies, it doesn't require too much of your life to consume the damn things before you start mouthing off about 'em).

So I don't know; maybe this is a great book, maybe it sucks. I'm guessing it's more likely to be of interest to people who are drawn to Superman by the movie and/or it's advertising presence, as such a significant portion of the film is set on Krypton (far more than in the previous five films), and this seems to be a book about Krypton rather than Superman.

•Enemies and Allies by Kevin J. Anderson: Another Anderson-written novel, with a colon and the sub-title "A Novel" following it. At least this one's tag-line is worthwhile, explaining the premise a bit: "The Dark Knight Meets the Man of Steel."

Again, never read it, no intention of reading it (Maybe if I didn't so regularly read so many comics about The Dark Knight and The Man of Steel and the two of them meeting, I'd be more interested in a novelization of the premise). Maybe it's awesome, maybe it sucks. It does seem a bit less relevant than the other Anderson Superman novel though, in that Batman is not in this Superman movie. Probably the next one, though!

It looks like an Alex Ross cover there. Note the costumes the characters are wearing; Superman's in his traditional costume, while Batman's wearing the black-and-gray, "No Man's Land"-to-New 52 costume Ross seems to best like drawing (only his Batman always has visible eye-balls instead of white triangle eyes).

•Superman and Philosophy: What Would the Man of Steel Do? by Mark D. White and William Irwin: There's a _____ and Philosophy or The Philosophy of________ book for every even mildly popular geek franchise (ditto cookbooks). That fact kinda makes me wish I woulda took better notes in my philosophy classes in college, so I could have kept my eyes peeled for trailers for upcoming movies and have manuscripts for The Green Hornet and Philosophy or The Philosophy of Spring Breakers or whatever already to send to publishers so they could have 'em in print the weekend the movie opens.

I didn't read this book, although the answer to the question posed in the title doesn't seem all that difficult. Like Jesus, I feel I've read and heard enough about Superman, a pretty stand-up, straight-forward guy, that I could tell you what he'd do in just about any situation without having to read a whole book on the subject.

But, again, I don't actually know what I'm talking about—this book could be the best (Pop Culture Touchstone) + Philosophy book ever written. (The only one I tried reading was one about Batman, which was a collection of essays by various writers, and I only got a few chapters in before I got bored; I like reading prose, and I like reading about Batman, but I don't like reading prose about Batman. Go figure).

I imagine this made the display simply because it's new-ish and they had a lot of 'em. If you were only gonna put up one non-fiction prose book about Superman though, I think you're better off with Larry Tye's Superman: The High-Flying History of America's Most Enduring Hero (which I've read) or Glen Weldon's newer Superman: The Unauthorized Biography or Brad Ricca's newer still Super Boys: The Amazing Adventures of Jerry Siegel and Joe Shuster, The Creators of Superman (which I also haven't read).

But given the curious decisions and moral choices the Man of Steel makes in Man of Steel, maybe a book about philosophy is more relevant. Hell, I think Man of Steel's Superman shoulda read a copy of it while he was walking the world working odd jobs. If nothing else, the screenwriters and producers oughta skimmed it before they lensed the climax.

I didn't flip through the book myself, but I imagine Superman's unwillingness to take a life under just about any circumstances is in there somewhere.

•Superman: The Last Son of Krypton by Geoff Johns, Richard Donner and Adam Kubert: The title story was the first story arc of the once much ballyhooed and hyped run on Action Comics featuring the writing team of Geoff Johns and Richard Donner (the guy who directed some Superman movies when Geoff Johns and I were children) and drawn by Adam Kubert, the long-time Marvel artist finally coming to do some ongoing, high-profile work for DC Comics.

I remember not liking it too much—their Bizarro was kind of horrifying rather than funny, and this is the story where Lois Lane and Clark Kent adopt a super-powered boy from the Phantom Zone and name hims after Christopher Reeves, who, later in the run, after Kubert fell away, replacement artist Gary Frank started drawing Superman to resemble to an almost eerie degree (In fact, I think this was the only arc that Donner and Kubert participated in, and that Kurt Busiek had to write a lot of fill-in issues between installments of their arc until Frank came on as the new artist; his first story, "Brainiac," is also included in this collection).

It's not a great one to hand to a newcomer to Superman, really, as adding Chris to the Superman family sort of upsets everything to such a strong degree (And, honestly, I think the boy's introduction was one of the half-dozen or so motivating factors toward the New 52 reboot; one of those things that DC felt it would have to walk back eventually). The follow-up story with Brainiac does feature a lot of Krypton business though, and some alien invasion aspects and a threat to Smallville, so I guess there's some overlap with aspects of the film.

I can think of at least three other Geoff Johns-written Superman graphic novels that would be better-suited to new readers (see below).

•All-Star Superman by Grant Morrison and Frank Quitley: You can't see the cover for this in my picture of the display all that well, as it's bent nearly in half, apparently from so many people picking it up and flipping through it.

You'll get no arguments from me about this being on display anywhere. If anyone asked me for a suggestion for a Superman comic book to read, this is the one would top my list. If it's not the best Superman story ever, it's the best self-contained, stand-alone, in-print graphic novel, and the the comic that best extolls the various virtues of the various versions of Superman and his supporting cast of allies and enemies there is.

In many ways, this is the ultimate Superman experience, in any media, as it accounts for so many of the best parts of the best takes of the character from various media. I haven't re-read it in a while now, though, and I bet that part where Morrison includes Superman's creation by Joe Shuster and Jerry Siegel within the comic itself is going to read really weird and really uncomfortable in light of the extremely uncharitable, even ignorant things he wrote about those creators and that creation in his Supergods book.

•Superman For Tomorrow by Brian Azzarello, Jim Lee and Scott Williams: I was slightly surprised to see this rather controversial—"controversial" as in some people loved it, many people hated it, and few were anywhere in between—Superman story sitting here, until I realized, "Duh, Jim Lee," and then it made sense. I mean, they used Jim Lee's Action Comics #1 variant cover as the little poster setting off the whole display there, of course they're going to have this Jim Lee-drawn story arc included in their Superman display.

I haven't re-read it since it was originally serialized, and my recollections come down to this: 1). I was surprised by the backlash, as I thought it was a pretty good story, infinitely better than the Jeph Loeb/Jim Lee Batman run that immediately preceded it, in that it was more of a story than an excuse for Lee to draw everything associated with the franchise (as in that "Hush" mega-arc in Batman), 2). There's a really neat scene where Superman's underwater, and you turn a page and there's Aquaman and a huge army of whales and intimidating-looking sea-life arrayed across a two-page splash shown in long-shot, all just staring Superman down, and I remember thinking "Dayumn" (For maybe the first and only time in my life, now that I think of it), 3.) There's a big, giant stone monster with the four heads of Mount Rushmore atop its shoulders; that image really stuck with me, and 4.) That one supporting character looked so much like Jim Gordon that it distracted the hell out of me, and I couldn't understand why of all the different kinds of human beings in the world, Lee decided to design a new character to look so much like a prominent supporting character in another of DC's comics.

I seem to recall the storyline dealing somewhat with an issue that J. Michael Straczynski raised at the beginning of his aborted Superman run in which Superman walks around being a jerk for a while—why doesn't Superman use his powers to save every human being from death from natural causes, like cancer and/or tumors—but in a less idiotic way.

Oh! It also prominently features a priest character, who Superman talks to a lot for advice, so I guess there's a tie-in to Man of Steel, where he randomly asks a random priest whether he should surrender to Zod to save humanity or not.

•Superman: Earth One Vols. 1 and 2 by J. Michael Straczynski and Shane Davis: Speaking of JMS...

These are the original graphic novels that are essentially DC's version of Marvel's concept for their Ultimate line when it originally launched: Familiar characters presented as brand-new and contemporary, targeting readers interested in the characters from their appearances in other media, but intimidated by the decades of continuity the serially-published monthly comics have created (Of course, in DC's case, the New 52-boot erases a great deal of the gulf between "Ultimate" Superman comics like these and "Ultimate" Superman comics like the ones they publish every month in Superman, Action and other appearances throughout their line).

I don't really like JMS's writing much (and he's said so many horrible things during the hyping period of Before Watchmen that I get a little grossed out whenever I think about him now; a pretty big barrier to sitting down and reading a graphic novel of his for pleasure). And I don't really like Shane Davis' art much. And nothing about this "Superman for the Twilight" audience project really interested or excited me, although I can understand why DC pursued it, and it's my understanding that it's done fairly well for them in the bookstore market.

Finally, the two books on the bottom are a new-ish edition of one of those theme encyclopedias (Superman: The Ultimate Guide to the Man of Steel) and the other looks to be a coffee table book pertaining to the new movie, which I did not pick up or flip-through.

Of the five comics included in that display, it's interesting to note that they didn't rack any New 52 Superman comics, although that's the red shorts-less, younger, less-experienced version of the character that is closest to the one in the film than any of these other Supermen. Two of the books are from the "old" post-Crisis, pre-Flashpoint continuity (Last Son of Krypton and For Tomorrow), one is the standalone, continuity-of-its-own All-Star incarnation of the character and the other two are from the standalone, continuity-of-its-own Earth One line.

And all three of those differing versions of Superman wear red shorts!

I'm not sure what DC has in print, exactly, although when I went to that same store's comic section, I saw all the New 52 comics starring the super-people and was sorta surprised to see Kurt Busiek and Stuart Immonen's excellent Superman: Secret Identity there, but here are a few books I think would be better for a big box book store display trying to grab readers who might have just seen that movie into buying some trade paperback collections of comics.

•Superman: Birthright by Mark Waid and Leinil Francis Yu: Swear to God, when I originally read this in trade, I thought to myself, "Hey, when they next try to reboot the Superman film franchise, they oughta just base it on this." It was Superman's origin (again), but focused on parts we don't normally see much of (that is, the stuff between leaving Smallville and getting a job in Metropolis), it gave Ma and Pa Kent more to do than usual, and it really focused on Superman as a potential alien invader who becomes a benevolent alien protector instead, here having to battle off a menace from his homeworld being used against Earth (and, in the process, helps sharpen Luthor's pathological hatred of Superman into something understandable, if not relatable, if his main objection to Superman is that he's an alien).

I guess the producers of Man of Steel were pretty fond of it, and I understand there was even some dialogue taken straight from it, but I didn't notice anything directly from the book while watching the film (Maybe because I read the book eight years ago?). Regardless, this is a Superman origin story in which Superman fights a bunch of Kryptonian shit that's wrecking Metropolis, and has some pretty obvious parallels to the film in terms of plot and theme (It is, it should go without saying, much better though).

•Superman: Secret Origin by Geoff Johns, Gary Frank and Jon Sibal: "Last Son" is probably the all-around weakest of Johns' Superman stories. Escape From Bizarro World with artist Eric Powell is a real treat, and Superman and The Legion of Superheroes with Frank and Sibal certainly has it's pleasures. Both would be pretty interesting to subject to a newcomer to Superman or superheroes, as these books are like mainlining Silver Age super-concepts; both story arcs are just avalanches of colorful costumes, character names and fanciful superpowers, particularly the latter.

But Secret Origin, Johns' version of Mark Waid's version of John Byrne's version of Superman's seemingly always-in-some-state-of-being-retold origin story. Their big innovation is in "casting" Christopher Reeve as Superman, which is somewhere between creepy and endearing, and may or may not even be something the target audience for a display like that would even pick up on, given the age of those Reeves movies, and tying Brainiac into Superman's origins in a way that both the Animated Series animated series and Grant Morrison and company's New 52 origin did.

And, again, here's the origin of Superman, the same subject of Man of Steel

•Superman: Action Comics Vol. 1: Superman and the Men of Steel by Grant Morrison, Sholly Fisch, Rags Morales and others: Speaking of Morrison, this trade collects the first chunk of his run on the rebooted, New 52 version of Action Comics, presenting yet another origin of sorts for the Man of Steel, this one differing from the others in its attempts to fuse the original, Golden Age take on the character (dead parents, leaping instead of flying, crusading for social justice rather than defending the status quo) to the more familiar version he's grown into. It also prominently features that neat t shirt and jeans and work boots costume, which looks better and better the longer you look at Jim Lee's high-collared, heavily armored version of the character's New 52 costume.

They're not great comics, and the constant shifts in artists that plagued like 45 or so of the New 52 titles don't help matters at all, but, this being Morrison, even his not-that-great is still extremely interesting, and can make for a better read than what many of his peers have come up with.

If you were to include a New 52 book on a display like this, or try to sell a new reader on New 52 Superman, this is the book you'd wanna do it with, as its sister book, Superman was a mess from day one.

•All Those "New Krytpon" Comices From Like 2010-2012 by Like A Dozen Different Creators: I started reading this gigantic storyline, in which Krytpon is kinda sorta restored as it's own planet in our solar system, Superman gets exiled from Earth to live on Krypton, and the two planets kind of eye each other warily until they eventually go to war, the end result being the destruction of the new version Krypton and an all-around Kryptonian genocide.(Go Earth...?)

It went on a while, and some of the related books are just kinda sorta filler, as DC had to invent or maneuver or rejigger other characters to star in Superman's books while he was off-planet. I think Collected Editions has the whole reading order here, although if you just stuck with the four volumes of Superman: The World of New Krytpon, the few volumes of The Last Stand of New Krypton and Superman: The War of the Supermen, you'd probably get all the important bits (Unless you, like, care that Mon-El gets a new costume and protects Metropolis while Superman's in outer space, or that Clark and Lois' adopted son Chis super-ages into a teenager and becomes the new Nightwing in a Nightwing and Flamebird duo).

Like I said, I started reading these, and kind of lost interest, intending to try them in trade someday, but it became so big and unwieldly (Like, if I have to look up a reading order on the Internet, then that's usually a good indication that the story isn't organized all that well) and the ending so depressing that I never felt the need to get back to it. I recall James Robinson being the writer most involved for the longest (Greg Rucka and Geoff Johns had some input at the beginning, but I think sort of drifted away as it went on), and I don't recall any artists that I'm particularly fond of drawing any of it for any significant portion of time.

Still! This is a storyline/s about Krypton and Earth warring, with Superman caught in the middle, and thus would likely be of interest to Man of Steel viewers. I'd chuck War of the Supermen up on that display at the very least.

•Superman Vs. Zod by A Bunch of Different People: Finally, here's one I didn't read, but I thought worth mentioning since DC seems to have packaged and released it specifically because of the (then upcoming) new film.

One of those themed trade paperback collections DC occasionally releases starring Superman, this one features various battles with Zod throughout history. Their website only mentions Geoff Johns and Richard Donner and Rags Morales and Curt Swan as creators, but I imagine there are a lot of old-school (and all-time great) Superman creators involved.

I'm also unsure if this features only the original Kryptonian Zod, or if other Zods—like the mysteriousblack-armored, Eastern European version from Joe Kelly's run on the Super-books—are included.

Saturday, August 03, 2013

Meanwhile, a bunch of words about ten panels of Superman Unchained #2...

I'm going to list the links to the reviews I wrote at other sites this week in reverse order, because the one I have the most to say about here is the one that was published latest in the week. That would be my piece at Robot 6 this week, in which I review four second issues of a couple of big, newish series (It occurred to me that I—and, I think, a lot of individuals and outlets—understandably focus only on the first issues of new series, or "event" issues, in which something happens, but there's always an element of "I guess we'll wait and see" when discussing the first issues of serial comics, so I thought it might be interesting to focus on #2 instead).

Anyway, I wanted to take a closer look at this one particular scene from Superman Unchained, which I kind of made fun of a bit at Robot 6, but did not feel it was a good use of my space or readers' time to discuss too deeply what I found really rather weird about that sequence. That's what blogs are for, after all!

So, in this issue, Superman saves a skyscraper from collapse in Dubai and has a meeting with Batman. Then he flies off to the Salt Flats in Utah to have a tense conversation with Lois Lane's estranged father, General Lane:
Look at that first panel.

That's a pretty good example of Jim Lee being a good draftsman and drawer-of-superheroes-being-super, but not a great comics storyteller (I think he and Snyder are feeling each other out and not gelling yet, and I think there's probably a reason All-Star Batman and Robin, The Boy Wonder is Lee's best work—it was written by a great cartoonist with great storytelling chops, so all Lee really had to do was draw the script and it all "worked" like a comic should).

Anyway, note those directional speedlines, that make it look like Superman is flying into the panel with Lane. That's pretty awesome. On the previous page, there's a big-ass panel of Superman flying in the desert, with his fist (he's flying fist first) and pat of his arm bleeding over the border of the next tier of panels, as if Superman is flying out of this panel and, in the turn of a page, into the next one—it's a nice, super-subtle demonstration of Superman's super-speed and fight; he's not bound (or "chained") by the limits of conventional space and physics.

But then Lee goes and screw is up, drawing Superman's left foot and crossing over the panel border as well, so that it looks like rather than flying into the panel, landing in a scene in the desert with General Lane, he's just passing through, having the first part of their conversation while flying by him, to land in a super-tiny, horizontal, just-there-to-have-some-place-to-stick-some-more-dialogue-bubbles panel (And he seems to be landing far to the right of...himself in it...? What the fuck is going on here?).

It's well-drawn and looks cool enough, until you really start looking at it, and then you notice, "Oh wow, Jim Lee was doing something kinda cool and clever here, wasn't he?" And then, a split-second later, you realize that it was either by accident, or he tried doing something cool and clever and then fucked it up.

He's the best-selling, most-popular comics artist in the U.S. though, and he's co-publisher in the company; what's an editor like Matt Idelson or Chris Conroy supposed to tell their boss? "Pretty good try, but can you move the Superman figure so he looks like he's landing in the panel, rather than diagonally floating past it? And maybe make it smaller, so the second panel has at least as much detail and impact as one of those little incidental cartoons Sergio Aragones doodles in the borders of our Mad magazine? Thanks boss!"

Anyway, those panels really stuck in my head.

What initially drew my attention to them, though, was Lane and his coffee.

Lee draws a really nice paper coffee cup and a really nice black plastic spoon, but he draws terrible coffee. Look at the way it sticks to the spoon, like beef gravy or chocolate sauce.

I also puzzled over the dialogue in this scene. See, Lane's at some super top-secret military installation in the middle of nowhere, building anti-Superman tanks and what not. He brags about the quality of the coffee. And I was thinking, isn't it weird that Lane uses a paper cup and plastic spoon? Wouldn't he have his own mug, if he's on a military base and drinks a lot of coffee? Otherwise, they gotta keep brining in paper coffee cups. But no, I thought, maybe that is the way the military thinks. They've got all that money, might as well spend it on paper coffee cups and plastic spoons rather than just buying Lane a reusable mug.

Finally, there's the bit with the spoon. Now, I understand, narratively, why Snyder and Lee have him drop it, although I have a lot of questions about how Lane and the coffee got there (It's still steaming hot; he's apparently just put sugar in it, but I don't see any sugar packets, and he's in the middle of a desert, with no, like, cafe's or tables or tents nearby. Where did his coffee come from? Where did the sweetener come from? Why is it still so hot?).

It's to draw the eye of the reader (And Superman) to the desert floor, which we see ominously opening, to (rather poorly, from a structural sense) reveal Lane's anti-Superman arsenal.

But, within the story, why would Lane just throw his spoon on the ground like that? Just straight-up, cold littering, man! He's supposed to be a disciplined military man, right? Running a top-secret facility, underground in order to hide it? Well, plastic spoons covered in viscous coffee lying around prove someone was around there recently, right? Scooby-Doo woulda smelled that, Velma would said "Jinkies!" and the gang would know there's something not quite right in the desert there.

Or maybe Lane knew exactly where he was dropping that spoon, and that when his secret trapdoors opened up to reveal his super-tanks, the spoon would fall down below into the base, leaving no clues behind. Hell, maybe the only reason he had the spoon and was stirring his viscous coffee was so that he could drop it on the crack in the desert floor to draw Superman's eyes to it. I think I have now officially over-thought those panels.

I really liked the opening scene, but this whole exchange with the coffee and the spoon stuck in my head just as strongly as that of the positives of the opening scene.

Now that I'm thinking about it, I wonder if Lee wouldn't benefit from another artist doing breakdowns for him...not necessarily sketching things out into the panels for him, but at least, like, determining the number of panels and the way they're arranged on the page. Like, what if Snyder gave his script to, say, Keith Giffen, Giffen translated it into less-detailed versions of the breakdowns he did for 52, and then had Lee do his thing?

I imagine it would speed up the process, and thus allow Lee to stay on a title longer, and I imagine it would improve the overall quality of the storytelling quite a bit.

But then, like I said earlier, I don't think anyone cares all that much. Everyone loves Jim Lee, and I don't think DC's biggest priorities right now are (nor should they be) making Lee a better, more perfect comics story-teller. Of the whole line, Superman Unchained is hardly the comic that needs, like, tinkered with. But then, I suppose if I were Lee, I'd want to keep getting better and better, and I'd want to be remembered for drawing great Superman comics, rather than comics with great drawings of Superman in them.

Hmmm. You know, I think when the first trade of Superman Unchained is released, I'd like to read it and then re-read Brian Azzarello and Lee's "For Tomorrow" Superman arc in trade and compare the two...

Also at Robot 6 this week, but not by me, is a pretty great column by Tom Bondurant on the Grant Morrison era of Batman comics, which just officially ended this week. The fact that Morrison was given a kind of pass on the New 52, and continued telling a story the New 52 pretty much directly contradicted and made impossible (save for only tiny tweaks being enforced, like Tim Drake's costume changing, for example) was sort of obvious, as was the fact that Morrison and Snyder's different takes and directions were overlapping one another in a way that didn't flatter either creator (Ideally, Morrison would have finished his run before Snyder began his), but Bondurant sees Morrison offering a positive influence on Snyder (Personally, I thought Snyder was doing a great job with the Dick Grayson-as-Batman Detective Comics, during the period in which Morrison was still the primary Batman writer, and his storyline was the dominant one—which lasted until the New 52 reboot scuttled it and put it on hold while DC figured out how to go forward with it...and Morrison tried reinventing Superman on-the-fly for them).

Bondurant points out that some of Morrison's many changes were "ratified" by their appearances across the DCU line—Damian Wayne, for example, Dick Gryason as Batman, Dick and Bruce as simultaneous Batmen—but the Batman Inc concept never enjoyed such an embrace by the rest of the DCU, rarely if ever getting mentioned (In retrospect, beyond that neat Knight and Squire miniseries and Batwing, there wasn't much acknowledgement in the wider DCU of many of these characters. I hold out hope for a Club of Heroes series written as a Justice League of all Batmen in the future, post-Morrison DCU though).

Anyway, a good piece contextualizing Morrison and his work within DC as a universe and a publisher.

Hey! Look at this! It's a Mort Drucker drawing of Christopher Reeves as Superman, from his Mad magazine parody of the first Superman movie, "Superduperman."

I was really struck by how much it looks like Gary Frank's version of Superman, from his recent-ish run on the Superman comics with writer Geoff Johns. I mean, it was obvious at the time that Frank was trying to model his Superman off of Reeves', but holy smokes it was weird seeing a caricature of Reeves drawn in the late seventies by Drucker, and being reminded so strongly of Gary Frank's Superman.

"Superduperman" is just one of the many Superman parodies and gag pieces you'll find in the Mad Super Spectacular: Superman, Man of Steel special that DC released in June to tie-in to the latest Superman movie. I reviewed it for Good Comics For Kids here, if you're interested, and returned to some of the jokes that didn't age well here.

And hey, speaking of that Mad special, what did you think of Superman's costume in the new movie? Didn't care for it?
Well, according to Sergio Aragones, you can blame Wonder Woman.


And finally...

I also reviewed The Malevolent Mr. Burns for Good Comics For Kids this week (Of special note to a few of you may be the fact that the first story in this issue is written by Ms. Gail Simone).

The above two panels were my favorite gag in the issue. They're from a story by Ian Boothby and Chris Houghton.

Thursday, August 01, 2013

Some Mad magazine jokes that didn't age super-well

I read and reviewed the Mad Super Spectacular: Superman, Man of Steel for Good Comics For Kids (you can read it here, if you like), and I was rather surprised by some of the contents (none more than the bull semen joke in the Superman Returns parody, really, but that's only because it was a joke about bull semen in a place I did not expect to find a joke about bull semen).

The book contains the Mad parodies of each of the Superman movies save for Superman IV, plus one for Smallville. The great Mort Drucker drew all of them (except for the Superman Returns one), and I was rather surprised at how many gay jokes were in them.

I can't necessarily say I was offended by them, and I don't think they necessarily should have been edited out of the book, or that DC shouldn't have collected those comics because of the presence of those jokes in them, or that people shouldn't ever make gay jokes. Personally, I don't think any subject should ever be off-limits to a comedian of any kind (including cartoonists, obviously), but the thing is, if you're going to embrace potentially offensive, controversial subject matter, then you have to be funny enough to justify doing it (Comedy is one place where I think the ends usually do justify the means).

And I certainly don't think one shouldn't be able to make jokes about Superman being kinda gay. He was a character who, in the 1940s through early 1980s or so, clumsily, half-heartedly courted a woman he didn't really like, let alone love, while keeping a deep, dark secret from everyone but his very best friend (who had the very same secret).

And Superman would literally enter a literal closet, and then come out of the closet as his more flamboyant, true self.

Also?
None of these "Superman is gay" jokes really qualify as funny, though, and thus don't really justify their existence. (Humor's subjective though, I suppose, and maybe some of you will find them funnier than I). They all seem really...odd in 2013. Like, these are subjects we don't really hear or tell jokes about much anymore, at least not in such a broad, clumsy, gayness-is-in-and-of-itself-inherently-funny kind of way.

Perhaps they made more sense at the time (I'm assuming and hoping that one about Arabs was referencing something specific and thus wasn't just the wild, offensive stereotype it looks like now, for example). I was technically around at the time of all of these, being born in 1977, but I wasn't conscious of much outside of my immediate surroundings. "My" Superman was the one on Superfriends and the Super Powers Saturday morning cartoon and toy line, and I didn't really watch any of the Chistopher Reeves movies until I saw bits and pieces on cable as a teenager and, later, on VHS and/or DVD as a grown-up.

So maybe this was okay, or at least common, in the late seventies or early eighties, but, man, it sure looks weird and wrong and off-putting in 2013:

—"Superduperman" (Parody of 1978's Superman), written by Larry Siegel



—"Superduperman II" (1980's Superman II), written by Frank Jacobs


—"Stuporman ZZZ" (1983's Superman III), by Stan Hart


—"Smellville" (2001's Smallville), Dick Debartaolo


Here's the weird Arab joke from the Siegel-written "Superduperman":


Finally, so as not to go out on a down note, here's a joke from the "Superduperman II" strip that is funny in a very different way, given the similarity of Man of Steel's plot and conflict to Superman...
...and the differences in the number of people who can be killed off in a 1980 PG movie vs. a 2013 PG-13 movie.

Sunday, July 28, 2013

Some notes and thoughts on Earth 2 Vol. 1: The Gathering

•This is a hardcover collecting the first six issues of Earth 2, a "second wave" (i.e. replacement) title in DC's New 52 line. The series is written by James Robinson, and the artwork comes primarily from the team of pencil artist Nicola Scott and inker Trevor Scott, although a second penciller and a second inker are also credited, as are three different colorists. As with other recent DC collections, it's not clear who did what page, but based on the fact that the Eduardo Pansica and Sean Parsons art team produces work similar enough in style to that of Scott and Scott, there aren't any terribly drastic shifts in visuals, and both teams do a fairly great job, particularly by New 52 standards.

•I trade-waited this series, but not because of misgivings about the creative team (I really like Nicola Scott's artwork quite a bit, and while Robinson's written some really quite incredibly terrible comics for DC of late, he has a large body of work full of more good comic book writing than bad comic book writing). Rather, I wasn't really sure what to make of the premise of the series, as suggested in its title.

•Most DC readers know that "Earth-Two" was the name of the parallel Earth where the Golden Age superheroes used to reside, a conceit the publisher used for a whole host of cosmic crossover adventures between Earth-Two's Justice Society of America and Earth-One's Justice League of America, between the time Gardner Fox introduced the concept in 1961 to the 1986-1987Crisis On Infinite Earths, which smooshed the two worlds and their sets of heroes (along with those of several other Earths) into one, single world with one, single history. Post-Crisis, there was no Earth-One and Earth-Two, just the "Earth" of the DC Universe, in which the Golden Age versions of most of the heroes had their adventures between the late 1930s and mid-1950s or so (excluding Superman, Batman, Robin and Wonder Woman, whose Golden Age versions more-or-less ceased to exist), while the other heroes of the DC Universe, including the Silver Age reboots of The Flash and Green Lantern and company, "The Trinity" and original Silver Age characters like Martian Manhunter began their careers on a sliding timeline of about ten years ago.

I liked that solution quite a bit, as it gave the world of the DC Universe a longer, more complicated, more interesting history, and sort of promoted some of the Golden Age characters to, if not co-equal, than at least more equal status to their Silver Age replacements. So while Flash Jay Garrick and Green Lantern Alan Scott might not have been in cartoons or appeared in the toy lines, while they might have looked like they threw their costumes together based only on the contents of a high school drama club's costume trunk, they were now portrayed as trailblazers and pioneers, the founders of a heroic legacy. They were fighting Nazis while Barry Allen and Hal Jordan were just twinkles in Julius Schwartz's eyes. Looked at from the real world, I like the way these characters' place in the fictional DC Universe acknowledged the work of their creators and the guys writing and drawing them in the 1940s; they were kind of like symbols of that era of creators, and their being a part of the DC Universe's story felt like an in-story acknowledgment and hat-tip to those creators as well as that era.

I understand that it never felt quite right to certain folks though, because it implied that Superman, for example, wasn't the father of all DC's superheroes, and it made Batman seem somewhat derivative of, say, Dr. Mid-Nite and The Sandman, rather than vice versa (And, unfortunately, it did de-couple Wonder Woman from the best era of Wonder Woman comics, the war-time efforts of her creator and artist H.G. Peter).

When DC rebooted their universe once again with The New 52, they deliberately did away with the Golden Age of superheroes altogether, and even cut their timeline of ten or so years in half to five or so, so that the heroes of the DC Universe can trace their careers only as far back as the final year of the Bush administration—The George W. Bush administration.

This title re-instated the multiple, parallel Earths concept then, and Earth 2 once more became the home of the Golden Age heroes like Flash Jay Garrick and Green Lantern Alan Scott, only with a twist—it would be presenting new versions of these Golden Age heroes in the present day, so rather than World War II veterans, the heroes of Earth 2 would be millennials and members of Generation Y, same as their counterparts in the regular DC Universe.

I wasn't really sure what to make of this, and given that the series was starting with an alternate take on the conflict from the first story arc of Geoff Johns, Jim Lee and company's New 52 Justice League, which I loathed, I figured this would be a comic I'd want to hold off on.

•To complicate matters more, a few years prior to the New 52 relaunch, DC started using the term "Earth One" to refer to a line of original graphic novels set in their own, distinct and (apparently) unrelated continuities (In easier to understand terms, "Earth One" now translates into DC's version of Marvel's "Ultimate," differing only in their format and the fact that the titles don't seem to interlock). So far there have been two volumes of J. Michael Straczynski and Shane Davis' Superman: Earth One and one volume of Geoff Johns and Gary Frank's Batman: Earth ONe, with a long in-the-works Grant Morrison-written Wonder Woman: Earth One expected in the near future.

So the DCU of The New 52, The New 52iverse, isn't ever explicitly referred to as Earth 1, even though there is now an Earth 2.

•Earth 2 differs rather significantly from Earth-New 52. For one thing, it only has 3-5 superheroes: Superman, Batman, Wonder Woman and, depending on whether you want to classify them as superheroes or sidekicks, Supergirl and Robin (These two young ladies come to Earth-New 52, find themselves terrible costumes, adopt the personalities Power Girl and The Huntress and star in Worlds' Finest, another "second wave" New 52 series).

•Also, they don't call superheroes "superheroes" on Earth 2. They call them "wonders," as in 2003's JLA: Age of Wonder Elseworlds series (republished rather recently as DC Comics Presents—JLA: Age of Wonder)

•Earth 2 opens in more or less the same place that Justice League did: It's five years in the past of the narrator (television producer Alan Scott, providing narration for a documentary he's produced), and an army of alien invaders is threatening to overwhelm the Earth. This Earth having fewer heroes, the aliens—which are, of course, Apokaliptian Parademons, here led by a redesigned Steppenwolf rather than a redesigned Darkseid—are doing a much better job of it, and Earth looks like it's in real trouble. Batman has a plan to stop the Parademon invasion, by infiltrating one of the towers they've erected and downloading a maguffin virus that will knock them all off-line, cutting them off from their home dimension.

•Also as in Justice League, the heroes are all, like, crazy violent.

Superman heat-visions them in their faces, grabs them by their throats and smashes their heads into pieces. Robin (Helena Wayne) guns a parademon down from the Batplane, and Batman even shoots one through the head. Wonder Woman chops off the heads of, let's see...five of 'em, on-panel, and uses the word "kill" repeatedly.

This being an alternate world with alternate versions of the characters, and ones that don't need to survive even one entire issue, Robinson certainly has more leeway in how he depicts their morality, and these alternate versions of the Trinity are depicted as being backed into a corner and fighting for survival. Wonder Woman, for example, is the last surviving Amazon: Steppenwolf and the Parademons have already killed every single one of her sisters.

The violence is also somewhat muted by the fact that these versions of Superman and Wonder Woman know that the Parademons are robots of some kind, or, at the very least, cyborgs, as Batman's plan is to knock out the towers remote controlling them (without which they will "fall from the sky," he says), and Scott goes to some pains to show wires, tubes and oil spurting from their wounds every time Wonder Woman chops a head or limb off, or Superman smashes one to bits.

In Justice League, remember, the heroes (and, presumably, the readers, if the New 52 was doing its job) were seeing Parademons for the first time, and Superman and company were just murdering them left and right, with no line of dialogue dedicated to explaining that they were mechanical monsters made of machinery and corpses or whatever and that, since they were already dead, it was okay to, say, sever their heads. Weirder still, the Parademons were just kidnapping people in that story, which, while certainly a crime and a scary experience for the victims, doesn't exactly merit execution on the spot from the likes of Superman and Aquaman, you know?

•Batman's plan works, downloading the virus is a suicide mission for him, and he doesn't survive the resulting explosion. Superman and Wonder Woman's part of the plan is to buy him some time. Both of them get killed as well. Superman by some kind of bomb the parademons attach to him, while Wonder Woman gets Geoff Johnsed:

•I know hindsight's 20/20 and all, but I think I found one way to improve upon Batman's plan. Rather than Batman himself climbing a tower and downloading the virus, which resulted in an explosion that killed the mortal Dark Knight, maybe he could have had Superman fly to the tower at top super-speed and install the virus for him; not only would the job get done a lot quicker, but chances are Superman might have survived the resulting explosion (Or maybe not; he did get blown up to death by an Apokoliptian bomb).

But in any case, Superman would have had a better chance of surviving. When it comes to suicide missions, enlisting the invincible, indestructible guy on your team is usually your best bet.

•I think opening a new title featuring new-ish characters with an adventure starring three other characters is kind of a weird strategy. It's not until the last five pages or so of the first issue that the stars of Earth 2 really appear. Alan Scott is revealed as the narrator, on private plane to Beijing. And Jay Garrick gets the last four pages; having just been dumped by his girlfriend, he's brooding alone on a hill at night with a six-pack, when the Greek God Hermes—seen earlier in the issue telling Wonder Woman that he and the other Olympians were trying to fight off Apokolips as well, and were getting their divine asses handed to them—appears to him (It works okay here in the trade, but was likely rather frustrating to those reading the monthly, serially-published installments).

•Most of the second issue is devoted to Jay Garrick's origin, which is here sort of like a mash-up of myth and Hal Jordan's origin; the dying Hermes gifts Garrick with his super-speed powers (which would certainly explain Garrick's old hat, but, this being the New 52, he has to have a new costume, which resembles his old one in some ways, but is heavily modified: His Hermes hat, for example, is now just a Hermes-inspired helmet, and looks more 1950s/1960s sci-fi than something truly mythological, like his old hat.

•Mr. Terrific II Michael Holt, who had a quickly-canceled title in the first slate of New 52 books (set on Earth-New 52), appears teleporting onto the Earth 2. He's immediately confronted by Terry Sloan, who introduces himself as the "smartest man on earth." That's the secret identity of the original Mr. Terrific. Sloan appears throughout this volume, and seems to be somewhere between an anti-hero and a villain.

•The same scene features an ad for Tyler-Chem (Hourman Rex Tyler was a chemist) and an add for a boxing match between Grant and Montez (Wildcat's secret ID being heavy-weight boxing champ Ted Grant; his first successor was Yolanda Montez, although the Montez in the ad isn't her, but a big, bearded, bald burly guy).

Later, a character mentions a man named Fate, and there's a "Commander Dodds and His 'Sandmen'" working for the World Army.

•Alan Scott's origin starts in this issue. He's riding a bullet-train with his boyfriend Sam, and pulls out a ring to propose to him, just as the train explodes (This is more-or-less in-keeping with his Golden Age origin, minus the boyfriend part).

•While Garrick received his super-powers from a dying god, Scott gets his from a glowing green fireball, that reminded me of the burning bush of Moses' story. A big deal was made out of Alan Scott being rebooted as gay at the time of this comic's original, serial release, but it is, of course, anything but controversial. It's very much a situation of a hero who happens to be gay, rather than a gay superhero. The gender of either Scott or his boyfriend could have been changed, and nothing about the story itself would have changed.

•Sam is "fridged" within an issue of being introduced...sorta. The main thing accomplished by having Scott in the midst of a proposal when his train explodes and the flame finds him is that it allows a rationale for him to be a hero who fights with a ring: "You must have a token or weapon with which to focus your power," the green fire says, "Something close to your heart." (Later, Scott is briefly tempted to stay in the land of the dead with Sam rather than returning to the land of the living to fight on, I suppose that's a second reason to include the Sam character's death in Scott's origin).

•The only other heroes introduced in this volume are Hawkgirl (Kendra), who has an unusually not-so-bad redesign, complete with a new color scheme and a hawk-helmet with a hint of Egyptian design about it, and The Atom, diminutive World Army Sergeant Al Pratt, who gains both size-changing and nuclear powers after exposure to Apokaliptian energies and a nuclear weapon the World Army was planning to use against the enemy.

Both are part of the government's plans to manufacture their own Wonders, but Kendra escaped and went rogue, while The Atom remains a loyal soldier (and thus is in conflict with the other three heroes of Earth-2).

•The four heroes—Flash, Green Lantern, Hawkgirl and The Atom—are united by the common foe of Grundy, who is here a hulking, zombie-like creature wearing a sort of butcher's apron and commanding tendrils of dead plant-life. He's the champion of The Grey, a death-force in opposition to The Green, of which Green Lantern is the new champion, and his plan is to draw out GL and kill him. Obviously, that doesn't happen, as the four heroes defeat him (after spending some time with The Atom trying to capture Hawkgirl and The Flash).

•All in all, this turned out to be an all-around pretty good New 52 superhero comic, although, ironically, even if I had tried out the first issue when it was initially released serially, I probably would have ended up dropping the book. Scott's art on that issue is nice and all, but the plot of the first issue amounts to little more than "Superman, Batman and Wonder Woman all die horribly," and that's not the sort of first issue that makes me wanna read a second issue.

By the end of this trade though, I was eager to see what would happen next, and I find myself looking forward to the next trade.

Naturally, this creative team doesn't last long; Robinson is already departing the book. And DC Comics in general. Not that we should read anything into Robinson being the 27th or so professional with long-standing DC ties to run away from the publisher screaming!

I think I was most surprised by how good this turned out to be because Robinson, like Johns, is a writer whose best work for DC has been fairly grounded in arcane continuity and recycling and reusing the publisher's many pre-fab characters—generally, the more unloved and obscure the better—and doesn't exactly have a reputation for radical reinvention. But he does a pretty good job of recreating some of DC's best-known characters into something completely new here, fusing their Golden Age secret identities with more Silver Age power-levels and concerns and distinguishing his origins of them greatly from pre-existing versions.

•I remember making fun of the cover for the second issue of the series—which shows Jay Garrick running through a sewer, covered in rats—when it was released. The cover of issue #3 shows Alan Scott on fire, the flesh of his left hand literally burning off of the bone. The following issue? A crowd of zombies pulling Hawkgirl out of the sky.

I don't know what the idea of these particular covers were, but Earth 2 really seemed to go out of its way to advertise superheroics as something truly nightmarish (and, in all of the above cases, the cover makes the events inside seem much worse than they are; The Flash handily traps a bunch of vicious mutant rats in a garbage can, rescuing a couple being swarmed by them in an alley, in a two-page sequence of standard superheroics, for instance).

After the first issue, which shows the Trinity killing Parademons, it's not until issues #5 and #6 where the covers depict the heroes doing something heroic (Although, even in these images, being a superhero seems to be more about fighting for your life, rather than, I don't know, being able to run super-fast or to fly.


•Despite my initial revulsion to these designs when I saw some of them released on cover solicitations and so forth, I actually kind of like most of them. The Flash costume certainly lacks the charm of the original, and putting the character in such man-made looking clothing given his divine origins here (The Kingdom Come Flash is probably the best blessed-by-Hermes Flash design), the more time I spent with it the more I liked it.

The Green Lantern costume also lacks the flair, charm and individuality of the original, but rather works here, striking a compromise between the Silver Age costumes and the Kingdom Come green knight loook. This Lantern costume wouldn't work if Scott were still sharing an Earth with a half-dozen or so other Green Lanterns similarly attired, as he'd get lost in the crowd, but here he's his Earth's only GL, so that's not a concern.

I actually like Hawkgirl's look, and how much it differs from the original (specifically in the color scheme). It certainly sets her apart from all the the other Hawks that have preceded her, and offers a strong contrast to the colors of her teammates (although the trio haven't really formed a team of any kind by book's end), whereas if she were in her old green and orange orgold, she'd be sharing a color with each of them.

I even kinda liked The Atom's costume, which looks like a cross between the costume of post-Infinite Crisis Damage and that of G.I. Joe bad guy Firefly.

Grundy looks pretty dumb, but his original look would have seemed out of place here as well, given his function in the story.

As for the Trinity, Superman's costume is a vast improvement over his New 52 duds: He's lost his shorts (but has red "paneling" around his hips, not unlike the weird metal space girdle he wears in the Man of Steel movie), a different cut to his boots, and a much bigger S-shield, but otherwise he still looks like Superman. Much better than Jim Lee's high-collared, darker-colored, heavily-armored Superman on Earth-New 52.

Wondy's costume has quite a bit of tinkering, her tiara becoming a heavy-dut, heavy-metal headband that threatens to eat her face, and instead of a bracelet on her left-hand, most of the arm is covered in armor. She also wears a sort of battle skirt instead of shorts or pants.

I prefer even the New 52 version (which is basically just an over-accessorized, darker version of her standard costume) to this, but not by much, really; a toned-down version of this costume (which exists in the sketch gallery in the back of the trade) could have worked justt fine in The New 52.

Batman's costume is pretty drastically different, looking closer to Damian Wayne's future Batman costume than one Bruce Wayne could conceivably wear in a normal continuity, but it's kinda hard to judge Batman costume's too closely, since we've seen somewhere around 700,000 different Elseworlds Batman costumes.

The book ends with a six-page sequence of Scott's pencils (which are so great it seems a shame they had to be inked and colored at all), and nine pages of character sketches.

According to these, Jim Lee came up with the Solomon Grundy, Teh Atom, The Batman and a Steppenwolf (Although the one used int he story looks nothing like his version). Scott apparently designed The Superman, The Wonder Woman (the final version of which differs greatly from the one shown here, which basically just looks like the sort of Wondy costume that could have been put together in ancient Greece), The Flash (with several different lightning patterns and color schemes apparently run through) and The Sandmen. Joe Prado gets a credit for The Green Lantern.

•Hey, check it out! I finally figured out how to make bullet points!

Saturday, July 27, 2013

Meanwhile....

It's been a while since I've seen a re-run of the Batman live-action TV show—it was before I'd hit puberty, at the latest—so I don't remember the contents of that Batman's Batcave all that well, but I'm pretty sure the Batspresso machine is new.

Man, I could really go for a Batspresso right about now, I think, depending on how much it differs from espresso...

Anyway, the above image is, of course, a panel from Jeff Parker and Jonathan Case's Batman '66 #1 (the paper version), which I reviewed for Good Comics For Kids earlier this week. In addition to being a pretty fun comic, I think it's especially noteworthy as being another kid-friendly, all-ages DC comic featuring the publisher's most popular hero (which brings the grand total up to two with Li'l Gotham; maybe more if you wanna count the Beyond stuff, but I don't, because that's just some punk kid without a cape, not the real Batman), and for its unequivocal embrace of a show that used to hang like an albatross around too many in comics for too long. Anyway, you can read my piece here.

That there is John Constantine, temporarily imbued with the powers of Shazam, holding aloft the head of a demon he had just torn off with his bare, super-powered hands, taken from the pages of the Ray Fawkes-written, surprisingly-nice-looking Renato Guedes-drawn Constantine #5, a tie-in to DC's kinda awesome, kinda dumb "Trinity War," which I'm still covering for ComicsAlliance. You can read that here.

Finally read the first part of DC's reboot of the the He-Man and Masters of the Universe franchise—collected in He-Man and the Masters of the Universe Vol. 1—which is breathtakingly, mind-bogglingly bad comics, with art on part with that of Countdown and an extremely confused script no doubt hurt by the original writer leaving after just one issue. See all those credits up there? Those are just the writers and pencil artists; it leaves out the eight—eight!—inkers. You can read that piece here.